Need sanity check on something

Hey all, 

Was trying to learn a little more about hedge funds and was talking to a quant at a pretty good firm, to get a feel for the industry. One thing that got mentioned in passing was the relative levels of technical chops required for different careers in the broader finance space, and in their opinion it went IB -> PE -> RX consulting -> HF. Didn't expect consulting to be there at all, let alone so high, so just want some second opinions on this, and if it checks out, why it's so technical. 

7 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I’ve done both - rx consulting (debtor side, creditor + UCC is not as good) had much more operational strategy and a wider array of responsibilities. Deals were almost always me, the ceo and cfo working on something consistently. Then you coordinate with bankers and lawyers. You have to know every part of the business and all tangential privileges. Often, the CRO and, sometimes, the modeler/junior will have to testify in court so you really get to know the code, how it works, the intricacies, etc.


I even worked on something where a rather vicious Board led to the CEO and CFO quitting so I ran it to liquidation. 

The work is more diverse, less repetitive and, imo, more interesting. The pay has really escalated in recent years - which is why you’re seeing a lot of rx bankers go to places like A&M and Alix.


Creditor/UCC mandates aren’t bad, but they’re lower compensated (save for a few big ones in recent years) and imo much less interesting. 

I think both roles have value in learning how to do them, but if I had to pick a career in RX - I find the CRO path very interesting and fun to do. 

 

Is it, in your experience, easy to exit between roles (top RX Consulting to top RX IB and vice versa, or is the move one-directional, as in it's easier to move from IB to RX consulting but harder the other way)?

 

Est similique sed deleniti id est in voluptatibus. Rem in nemo amet amet consequatur placeat sunt. Id commodi omnis dolor ut. Dolores quia ea enim.

Minus aliquam quia veniam molestiae. Qui sapiente dolor magni magni quia. Aut quia voluptatum pariatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Consulting

  • Boston Consulting Group 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 98.9%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.4%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.9%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Consulting

  • Cornerstone Research 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group 98.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 97.9%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.5%
  • Boston Consulting Group 98.9%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.4%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.9%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $361
  • Principal (30) $294
  • Director/MD (58) $274
  • Vice President (53) $247
  • Engagement Manager (113) $232
  • Manager (170) $173
  • 2nd Year Associate (185) $142
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (116) $135
  • Senior Consultant (355) $132
  • Consultant (642) $122
  • 1st Year Associate (577) $121
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (164) $121
  • NA (16) $114
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (391) $104
  • Associate Consultant (176) $101
  • 1st Year Analyst (1164) $90
  • Intern/Summer Associate (208) $83
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (633) $68
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”