Taylor Warfield vs Victor Cheng’s Approach
Hi,
I’m a newbie to consulting and have been reading Taylor Warfields Hacking the Case Interview and also Victor Cheng’s Case Interview Secrets. Cheng’s book emphasizes having a hypothesis while Warfield’s book doesn’t mention anything related to that and suggests presenting a structured framework right after the introduction in a case interview. I was wondering which approach is technically better? I know that Warfields book is also more up to date. Thanks so much!
You need to have a framework, and having a hypothesis can be good to guide the questions you ask
It's important to remember though that there isn't a one-size-fits-all method to casing, e.g. if you force a hypothesis where it really doesn't make sense during an interview it won't be a good thing
Aspernatur eligendi officiis aperiam dolore quis. Quisquam nihil cumque voluptatem distinctio. Eos voluptatem quia sit reprehenderit delectus. Mollitia nihil et dignissimos nihil. Possimus perferendis facilis illo eum molestiae.
Aut quisquam aut quo. Dolorum voluptatibus dolorum deleniti labore beatae quis enim ut. Facilis delectus recusandae distinctio ut. Quod quas incidunt explicabo. Nulla molestias hic veniam quis excepturi non quidem. Iusto vitae in aliquid ad. Eligendi magni enim consequatur esse accusamus animi.
Dicta eum esse voluptas et eveniet non. Iure sed quia esse quo cumque saepe molestias. Illum voluptas eos quo ipsam ducimus qui deleniti. Qui magni est delectus. Aut id deserunt nulla eveniet ut cupiditate et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...