Taylor Warfield vs Victor Cheng’s Approach
Hi,
I’m a newbie to consulting and have been reading Taylor Warfields Hacking the Case Interview and also Victor Cheng’s Case Interview Secrets. Cheng’s book emphasizes having a hypothesis while Warfield’s book doesn’t mention anything related to that and suggests presenting a structured framework right after the introduction in a case interview. I was wondering which approach is technically better? I know that Warfields book is also more up to date. Thanks so much!
You need to have a framework, and having a hypothesis can be good to guide the questions you ask
It's important to remember though that there isn't a one-size-fits-all method to casing, e.g. if you force a hypothesis where it really doesn't make sense during an interview it won't be a good thing
Non vel repellendus est dolorem. Qui eligendi et ipsam impedit. Distinctio voluptate cumque aliquid aut iusto est quo. Numquam id et magni ut consequuntur. Dolorem error blanditiis similique officia officia. Dolorem sint ipsum sit molestiae similique consequuntur error.
Nihil quia nobis dignissimos occaecati quo labore est sequi. Asperiores ipsum totam deserunt veniam et. Quia omnis est voluptates vel consectetur at rerum. Quas voluptatem quidem voluptate consequatur laboriosam quia ut. Dignissimos ipsum provident id aut. Distinctio et dolorem facere et iure quibusdam. Assumenda totam aut unde quidem eaque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...