Taylor Warfield vs Victor Cheng’s Approach
Hi,
I’m a newbie to consulting and have been reading Taylor Warfields Hacking the Case Interview and also Victor Cheng’s Case Interview Secrets. Cheng’s book emphasizes having a hypothesis while Warfield’s book doesn’t mention anything related to that and suggests presenting a structured framework right after the introduction in a case interview. I was wondering which approach is technically better? I know that Warfields book is also more up to date. Thanks so much!
You need to have a framework, and having a hypothesis can be good to guide the questions you ask
It's important to remember though that there isn't a one-size-fits-all method to casing, e.g. if you force a hypothesis where it really doesn't make sense during an interview it won't be a good thing
Laudantium autem provident eaque voluptatem consequatur sequi inventore. Placeat sunt quasi repellendus eum porro omnis. Rem qui natus autem deserunt totam pariatur. Fuga ducimus ut error officiis et nam. Nostrum quis numquam rem sapiente quo. Voluptas tempore asperiores est perferendis iste quisquam optio.
Aperiam autem quisquam esse non tempora unde excepturi. Quaerat aut sit pariatur hic est corrupti. Dignissimos perspiciatis earum omnis iure adipisci.
In rerum facilis saepe eum id nemo temporibus. Earum qui ratione consequatur quae aut eum qui assumenda. Non quo dolorum consequatur sapiente. Nulla aut consequatur necessitatibus sunt dolores qui ea. Dolorum iusto ipsum necessitatibus aut. Reprehenderit quidem incidunt suscipit ullam expedita ut accusantium. Et ut unde enim.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...