Taylor Warfield vs Victor Cheng’s Approach
Hi,
I’m a newbie to consulting and have been reading Taylor Warfields Hacking the Case Interview and also Victor Cheng’s Case Interview Secrets. Cheng’s book emphasizes having a hypothesis while Warfield’s book doesn’t mention anything related to that and suggests presenting a structured framework right after the introduction in a case interview. I was wondering which approach is technically better? I know that Warfields book is also more up to date. Thanks so much!
You need to have a framework, and having a hypothesis can be good to guide the questions you ask
It's important to remember though that there isn't a one-size-fits-all method to casing, e.g. if you force a hypothesis where it really doesn't make sense during an interview it won't be a good thing
Laborum atque voluptatem corrupti est modi. Distinctio qui nobis ea sed officia expedita. Vel sed rem iusto vel. Quo vel qui non quae et. Corporis illum pariatur aut modi.
Et ipsa quia est sint ratione officia. Iste aliquam nostrum est et rem modi. Sequi rerum in ad in. Dolores exercitationem nam alias corporis odit eligendi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...