4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

This is gonna read like a mess, but I've tried to clean it up as much as possible. On the creditor side (not UCC), one of the shittiest pain points is timing. You're often brought in after the house is already on fire, and the clock is ticking fast. There's immediate pressure to figure out whether there's a viable path to recovery, while also navigating borrower management teams who may not be fully transparent or realistic about the situation. You’re expected to get smart on a complex situation fast, often with limited access and a lot of noise.

As if that weren't bad enough, there's also the challenge of herding cats. Creditor groups are very very rarely aligned at the outset. Everyone has their own entry points, risk appetites, and internal politics so, getting consensus around strat can be a grind, particularly when litigation is on table or when value breaks are unclear. You spend a LOT of time educating stakeholders, not just on the facts, but on the chessboard three moves out. That can mean a lot of late nights trying to bridge gaps or prevent fractures within the group. And I mean really late nights. 

It gets worse, there's also reputational and strategic risk. As an RX guy, you're expected to push hard for your client, but go too far and you risk damaging relationships that could impact future deals, and deal with the bankers / PE ppl as well. You’re constantly walking a line between being effective and being viewed as overly aggressive or obstructionist.

And this may be a personal opinion, but in general, it's a grind. Especially in contentious situations where value is in question and you're in the middle of negotiations, litigation risk, financial shit and operational chaos. It’s rewarding work, but it’s definitely not for everyone.

As a lil bit of subtext, this is not always the case, but you're gonna sometimes deal with creditors who often want Rolls Royce advice but with Toyota Corolla budgets. You'll have to fight for every hour to get approved and paid through the restructuring process, especially if the debtor is tight on liquidity. Those sits sucked extra bad.

 

Nihil et eveniet consequatur accusamus sed nihil blanditiis. Libero amet qui sed quidem molestias et quis. Ullam asperiores fugiat asperiores tempore cumque. Eveniet sequi aut voluptatibus molestiae sint.

Neque est consectetur molestiae voluptatem architecto voluptatibus. Maiores ut recusandae vitae et. Doloribus voluptates aliquam quasi officia culpa deleniti totam. Adipisci modi quia dolores. Aut qui iure optio doloremque ea rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Consulting

  • Boston Consulting Group 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 99.0%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.4%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.9%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Consulting

  • Cornerstone Research 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 99.0%
  • Boston Consulting Group 98.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 97.9%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.5%
  • Boston Consulting Group 99.0%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.4%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.9%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $361
  • Principal (30) $294
  • Director/MD (58) $274
  • Vice President (53) $247
  • Engagement Manager (113) $232
  • Manager (171) $173
  • 2nd Year Associate (185) $142
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (116) $135
  • Senior Consultant (354) $132
  • Consultant (642) $122
  • 1st Year Associate (577) $121
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (164) $121
  • NA (16) $114
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (391) $104
  • Associate Consultant (176) $101
  • 1st Year Analyst (1163) $90
  • Intern/Summer Associate (208) $83
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (634) $68
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”