Careers in Corporate Finance
Hi everyone! Need help deciding which Corporate Finance roles is best career path. I am currently deciding between FP&A, Investor Relations, Corporate Treasury, Stress Test or Risk Management role. I would like to acquire transferable skillsets and can pivot to any industry besides banking. I am was recently laid off from the bank and looking to transition into these roles as I found them to be a little more stable. I welcome your advice, feedback or or any experience you can share!
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of the roles you're considering and how they align with your goals of acquiring transferable skills and pivoting across industries:
FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis):
Investor Relations:
Corporate Treasury:
Stress Testing or Risk Management:
Recommendation:
Ultimately, FP&A and Corporate Treasury stand out as the most versatile and stable options for your career transition.
Sources: Corporate Finance Q&A with accountingbyday, BJM85, STorIB, and djfiii, Accounting vs Finance: Part 1 – Career Paths, Is FP&A corporate finance?, Accounting vs Finance: Part 1 – Career Paths, List of Transferable Skills in Corporate Finance
Don't do Stress Test or Risk Management if you don't like saying no or if you want to please people/be liked.
Do IR if you are easy on the eyes and ears. Transferable skills (sales, PR) even outside of Finance.
Do treasury if you want a chill, albeit boring and small team/headcount, gig with some perks like dinings/outings from bankers. Unless you're at like a F250 or a company with complex financings, Treasurer and CFO is often the same position's responsibilities.
FP&A is indeed stable and transferable. Our head of FP&A was internally promoted from Corp Dev.
In my opinion, FP&A is the best of the bunch when it comes to transferability. You'll learn how your specific business works, do some modeling (much less intense), liaise with business function heads and senior people, and be home at 5pm.
There will almost always be a need for FP&A, you can move across the finance function and to different industries. Eventually, you could find yourself as a head of finance or CFO. Or you could just chill and not have anything too intense.
It's not a bad gig.
Maybe for the reporting side of FP&A but for the side that works on guidance /BoD decks, hours are much longer
Agree. I am a Director and own all financial reporting, but I’m also heavily involved with Operations and working with our C-Suite to build decks. Before my team grew, I averaged 50-60 hours a week. Now I’m able to relax more outside of budget season and month-end close.
I’ll say that being strictly FP&A (so just reporting) will make it tough to grow. It’s a critical skill set to have, but you have to be able to understand the ops side to really get senior management on your side.
I’ve turned down roles that would pay more $$$ due to them being pure reporting roles. I’m young and learning a ton in my current role.
I was surprised to learn how vastly different roles within FP&A are. I would argue the side that works on the decks (so with Senior leadership) gains a skill set comparable to (if not better) than standard IB coverage.
Now some of the intangibles from IB (learning by to be “online” 24/7) can’t be taught in FP&A, but technical skillset might be better in this side of FP&A.
Also, the exposure to senior leadership is invaluable. You work so closely with them, it wouldn’t be difficult to get a letter of rec from your CEO/CFO.
What are you referring to when you say "working on decks" vs reporting roles?
Et dolorum error beatae numquam tempore nisi doloribus. Cupiditate aperiam dolor qui ducimus vel. Cumque adipisci sit rem hic quis. Quo vitae hic repellat adipisci aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...