Corp Dev: M7 vs. High Growth SaaS
Coming from a tech growth equity background, what is more attractive for a junior corp dev role assuming same comp, role, etc? M7 companies or pre-IPO SaaS (Databricks/Figma/Miro) ?
In later stage recruiting processes and looking to understand which roles would provide the most upside in the long run (both comp-wise and company growth). Both companies are active in M&A and have similar deal flow.
I don't have many data points on corp dev comp progression and exit ops so any intel would be appreciated. I would think the SaaS role would provide more upside from equity if they end up going public/exit in the near term but also can't overlook how much capex/M&A FAANG companies are looking to spend with the whole AI narrative. Would imagine it's harder to climb the corporate ladder however.
Also any insight into corp dev case study interviews would be helpful as well.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's what you need to consider:
M7 Companies (FAANG/Big Tech):
Pre-IPO SaaS (Databricks/Figma/Miro):
Comp Progression and Exit Opportunities:
Corp Dev Case Study Interviews:
Recommendation: If you're looking for stability and brand recognition, M7 companies are the way to go. However, if you're willing to take on more risk for potentially higher rewards and faster career progression, the pre-IPO SaaS route could be more attractive. Ultimately, it depends on your risk tolerance, career goals, and the specific opportunities each role offers.
Sources: Q&A: Corp Dev Professional at Large-Cap Tech Company, Evaluating Corporate Development Roles, Corporate Development Manager - Q&A, The logic behind going into a Corp Dev/Strat for work-life balance?, The Other Road: Corporate Development Associate Fielding Questions
I'd go M7 for risk adjusted returns but YMMV.
Junior role at late stage unicorn you won't get that much equity (could be wrong) and need a lot of capital appreciation post-IPO (which isn't guaranteed to happen, even the IPO might not) to make big bucks. M&A track record varies but likely trends towards tuck-in deals vs. transformative.
M7 has big warchest and demonstrated record of M&A. Will be a great resume builder and you can move just about anywhere afterwards.
I would avoid finance and corp dev at tech companies. Like what do they even do (joking of course).. but only half joking
But seriously they’ll have an engineer run corp dev
Do M7-> IB if you’re serious about finance
Do PMM/PM/Strategy/marketing if you’re serious about tech
Or stay growth equity and be a small P&L owner in a growth equity firm
You're not wrong about an engineer running corpdev in some tech cos, though I've been pleasantly surprised at how good some former product people have been in mid/sr corpdev roles
I'd consider M7 > IB a backwards step though
Quis nihil in ab hic. Placeat numquam qui ut aperiam voluptatibus.
Est optio reprehenderit id vel adipisci dolores illum. Vel deserunt consequatur inventore maxime debitis vel laudantium voluptas. Voluptas et quia temporibus nihil. Non quas non iusto molestias rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...