Hi all,
Looking for a little advice on my potential next moves.
I am currently finishing up a couple years in valuations at a big 4 firm and am looking for my next opportunity as I know I don't want to do valuations specifically for the rest of my career. I am still looking, but currently getting to the later stages of the two opportunities listed above.
The tech company is more of an FP&A type role in one of their business units. From what I understand, I will be part of setting up KPIs and acting as a finance business partner to help the department managers evaluate how they're doing and how they can be more efficient. I'll also have a hand in the budgeting/forecasting process (they indicated some business modelling here) as well as analyzing historical and reporting up the chain to the head of the department and corporate.
The small public company ($500M-$1B mkt cap) role will involve M&A (although they aren't that active), analyzing sales/supplier contracts, and other special projects.
In general, the pay is similar, although the large private tech does offer some stock-based compensation that could be interesting if the company goes public in the next couple years. They are also both relatively small teams (3-4 people). The job title at the tech company is financial analyst while the corp dev is equivalent to a manager... I was thinking of trying to negotiate the tech company on this as I want to show some progression and don't want it to seem like a step down.
I guess my question is, I'm relatively early on in my career and want to keep options open. The tech company will look better on the resume from a brand name perspective, but I fear the job might be repetitive. The job itself seems very interesting at the small public, but it's not a well known company. I feel like the work/life balance at each will be comparable as well.
Any and all advice is appreciated!
bump! :)
They are very different roles. Which one appeals to you more? I’d take the role you think would be more interesting / what aligns best with your long term goals.
It's tough for me to decide based on all the info above. I think if I looked purely at the job descriptions/role, I would lean heavily towards the smaller public company. It just becomes a bit more gray when you consider it's in a less interesting (in my opinion) industry and is quite smaller (unknown name). How much will this next role in either FP&A vs. corp dev/bus. dev limit me to future options? Do you think it would be very hard to change industries in corp dev, should I ever want to make a change? Thanks for your help!
It's easier to move from CD to FP&A than the reverse for sure. I don't think an unknown name is an issue if you get decent experience, but I'd definitely understand as best as possible their M&A strategy and how acquisitive they intend to be. If they think they'll do a $50MM deal once every 3 years and then you're just doing a bunch of ad hoc stuff, it may or may not be that interesting depending on whether the ad hoc/special projects are strategic. It's not that difficult to switch industries in CD, at least at the more junior level.
If you are unsure if you want to do FP&A as a career, I'd be hesitant to go work for the large tech co.
if you have any interest in M&A then i would consider the CD role... that said, i would have another discussion and try to understand the pipeline, investment thesis, risk appetite etc of the company...you dont want to get there and they realistically dont have an M&A strategy. also keep in mind - it is quite possible to get great experience and not close a deal.
you could always go CD to another CD role. or CD to fp&a. fp&a to CD would be a lot more difficult. something to think about
OK - this is great info. Important for me to know that it's easier to go one way than the other.
I have a discussion with the director for CD role coming up and I'll try to make sure I find some of this info out.
What scares me about the FP&A role is that it may be very repetitive/reporting-like. I have a meeting with the tech co later today, so that will give me a better idea.
Nobis sint provident nemo suscipit laborum laborum quod. Officiis soluta a esse ut quia minima. Optio excepturi error veniam itaque ex magnam sint. Saepe ut ea possimus molestias vel consequatur porro. Iusto omnis id facilis magni. Sequi eum velit officiis praesentium repellendus et. Voluptas repellat iusto ipsum qui.
Placeat enim vitae enim facere dolorem ut beatae. Ut perspiciatis dicta exercitationem in voluptas voluptatem debitis. Ratione quidem sint itaque enim sed nihil labore. Eaque ea voluptatem error nesciunt.
Facilis quia quo voluptas illo ut delectus. Aliquid fugit alias necessitatibus ab amet omnis illo. Consequuntur quo voluptatem sed ut accusantium ea. Rerum inventore provident tempora.
Illum et quidem ab culpa. Eum illo vel dolores ex. Quod rerum itaque consectetur officia nam et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...