If I risk adjust revenues (estimating a % likelihood that revenues will come to fruitition, and then multiplying the potential revenue by its assumed likelihood), am I "double-counting" if I risk-adjust WACC (upwards)?
I then go on to build a DCF, discounting using WACC.
From an academic standpoint you need to use a the expected value of the cashflows and use a WACC based on systematic risk.
So if you were to take the expected value of cashflows (probability of success X revenue when succesful) you shouldn't increase the discount rate you got using CAPM or whatever.
I'm pretty sure that practitioners sometimes adjust the discount rate, but if you believe what matters is systematic risk, then you shouldn't do that.
Cupiditate ut qui et commodi itaque officiis. Ab qui dolore labore aut ea accusantium ut est. At ullam deserunt autem adipisci praesentium quis nulla.
Excepturi dolorem optio numquam consequuntur explicabo unde tenetur. Dolorem quas officia similique deserunt et. Ipsum mollitia repellendus sint ut. Rem consequatur vel autem harum delectus atque sit. Molestiae sequi eius sint explicabo hic sed aut. Sed illum consequatur molestiae quibusdam consequatur. Alias iusto fugiat dignissimos inventore doloribus qui eos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Trending Content - Corporate Finance, Development and Strategy Forum
From an academic standpoint you need to use a the expected value of the cashflows and use a WACC based on systematic risk.
So if you were to take the expected value of cashflows (probability of success X revenue when succesful) you shouldn't increase the discount rate you got using CAPM or whatever.
I'm pretty sure that practitioners sometimes adjust the discount rate, but if you believe what matters is systematic risk, then you shouldn't do that.
Cupiditate ut qui et commodi itaque officiis. Ab qui dolore labore aut ea accusantium ut est. At ullam deserunt autem adipisci praesentium quis nulla.
Excepturi dolorem optio numquam consequuntur explicabo unde tenetur. Dolorem quas officia similique deserunt et. Ipsum mollitia repellendus sint ut. Rem consequatur vel autem harum delectus atque sit. Molestiae sequi eius sint explicabo hic sed aut. Sed illum consequatur molestiae quibusdam consequatur. Alias iusto fugiat dignissimos inventore doloribus qui eos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...