Sep 10, 2024

IG PC vs Non-IG PC

What are the main differences in the underwriting process/portfolio management between investment grade private credit (think private placements) vs. non-ig private credit (mainly referring to middle market direct lending). Obviously issuers are much larger/stable/mature in IG PC but are there any LMEs in the IG world? What do those processes look like? Also, any difference in hours/comp/exit opps? thanks.

6 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are the main differences between Investment Grade (IG) Private Credit and Non-Investment Grade (Non-IG) Private Credit, particularly in the context of underwriting processes, portfolio management, and other aspects:

Underwriting Process:

  • Investment Grade (IG) Private Credit:

    • Credit Quality: IG deals with companies that have almost no credit risk.
    • Documentation: Extremely loose with basically no covenants.
    • Analysis: Less about credit metrics and underlying valuation analyses; more focused on trading around rates, spreads, and duration.
    • Maturities: Typically have substantially longer maturities.
  • Non-Investment Grade (Non-IG) Private Credit:

    • Credit Quality: Includes high yield (HY) and distressed credits.
    • Documentation: More complex covenant packages.
    • Analysis: More bottoms-up fundamental analysis, especially for lower-rated credits (e.g., low B and CCC).
    • Maturities: Generally shorter compared to IG.

Portfolio Management:

  • Investment Grade (IG) Private Credit:

    • Stability: Issuers are larger, more stable, and mature.
    • Liquidity: Deals are often more liquid compared to Non-IG.
    • Risk Management: Focuses on managing interest rate risk and duration.
  • Non-Investment Grade (Non-IG) Private Credit:

    • Stability: Issuers are smaller and may be less stable.
    • Liquidity: Deals are typically illiquid and held through maturity.
    • Risk Management: Involves more intensive underwriting and analysis due to higher risk.

Leveraged Management Buyouts (LMEs):

  • Investment Grade (IG) Private Credit:

    • Prevalence: Less common due to the stability and size of issuers.
    • Processes: When they do occur, they involve detailed due diligence and focus on maintaining investment-grade ratings.
  • Non-Investment Grade (Non-IG) Private Credit:

    • Prevalence: More common, especially in middle market direct lending.
    • Processes: Involves thorough due diligence, complex covenant structures, and detailed financial modeling.

Hours, Compensation, and Exit Opportunities:

  • Investment Grade (IG) Private Credit:

    • Hours: Generally more predictable and less intense compared to Non-IG.
    • Compensation: Typically lower than Non-IG due to lower risk and complexity.
    • Exit Opportunities: May include roles in corporate finance, treasury, or other investment-grade credit roles.
  • Non-Investment Grade (Non-IG) Private Credit:

    • Hours: More intensive due to the complexity and higher risk of deals.
    • Compensation: Generally higher to compensate for the increased risk and workload.
    • Exit Opportunities: Often include roles in private equity, distressed debt funds, or other high-yield credit roles.

For more detailed insights, you can refer to the WSO threads on private credit and direct lending.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/qa-non-target-top-bucket-ssg-private-creditdirect-lending?customgpt=1, Q&A: Non-target → Top Bucket SSG Private Credit/Direct Lending, What are the different types of Credit?, Private Credit / Direct Lending Comp, Undergraduate Opportunities - Credit Funds

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Esse quae officiis et qui laudantium. Sed ab quia expedita repudiandae nobis non placeat blanditiis. Non aperiam excepturi sunt nesciunt. Eveniet amet repudiandae et quasi est exercitationem consequatur. Nihil eius sed qui aliquid culpa quam asperiores. Officia quis dolorem voluptatem neque vero ut aliquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”