Sep 10, 2024

IG PC vs Non-IG PC

What are the main differences in the underwriting process/portfolio management between investment grade private credit (think private placements) vs. non-ig private credit (mainly referring to middle market direct lending). Obviously issuers are much larger/stable/mature in IG PC but are there any LMEs in the IG world? What do those processes look like? Also, any difference in hours/comp/exit opps? thanks.

6 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are the main differences between Investment Grade (IG) Private Credit and Non-Investment Grade (Non-IG) Private Credit, particularly in the context of underwriting processes, portfolio management, and other aspects:

Underwriting Process:

  • Investment Grade (IG) Private Credit:

    • Credit Quality: IG deals with companies that have almost no credit risk.
    • Documentation: Extremely loose with basically no covenants.
    • Analysis: Less about credit metrics and underlying valuation analyses; more focused on trading around rates, spreads, and duration.
    • Maturities: Typically have substantially longer maturities.
  • Non-Investment Grade (Non-IG) Private Credit:

    • Credit Quality: Includes high yield (HY) and distressed credits.
    • Documentation: More complex covenant packages.
    • Analysis: More bottoms-up fundamental analysis, especially for lower-rated credits (e.g., low B and CCC).
    • Maturities: Generally shorter compared to IG.

Portfolio Management:

  • Investment Grade (IG) Private Credit:

    • Stability: Issuers are larger, more stable, and mature.
    • Liquidity: Deals are often more liquid compared to Non-IG.
    • Risk Management: Focuses on managing interest rate risk and duration.
  • Non-Investment Grade (Non-IG) Private Credit:

    • Stability: Issuers are smaller and may be less stable.
    • Liquidity: Deals are typically illiquid and held through maturity.
    • Risk Management: Involves more intensive underwriting and analysis due to higher risk.

Leveraged Management Buyouts (LMEs):

  • Investment Grade (IG) Private Credit:

    • Prevalence: Less common due to the stability and size of issuers.
    • Processes: When they do occur, they involve detailed due diligence and focus on maintaining investment-grade ratings.
  • Non-Investment Grade (Non-IG) Private Credit:

    • Prevalence: More common, especially in middle market direct lending.
    • Processes: Involves thorough due diligence, complex covenant structures, and detailed financial modeling.

Hours, Compensation, and Exit Opportunities:

  • Investment Grade (IG) Private Credit:

    • Hours: Generally more predictable and less intense compared to Non-IG.
    • Compensation: Typically lower than Non-IG due to lower risk and complexity.
    • Exit Opportunities: May include roles in corporate finance, treasury, or other investment-grade credit roles.
  • Non-Investment Grade (Non-IG) Private Credit:

    • Hours: More intensive due to the complexity and higher risk of deals.
    • Compensation: Generally higher to compensate for the increased risk and workload.
    • Exit Opportunities: Often include roles in private equity, distressed debt funds, or other high-yield credit roles.

For more detailed insights, you can refer to the WSO threads on private credit and direct lending.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/qa-non-target-top-bucket-ssg-private-creditdirect-lending?customgpt=1, Q&A: Non-target → Top Bucket SSG Private Credit/Direct Lending, What are the different types of Credit?, Private Credit / Direct Lending Comp, Undergraduate Opportunities - Credit Funds

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Odio perspiciatis veniam repellendus eum magni alias exercitationem. Aut perspiciatis fugit delectus ut sed facere veritatis. Nulla et similique molestiae quo non in sunt velit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”