Liquid Credit vs Distressed Desk
Hi all. For context am a liquid credit analyst currently at a 20ishB AUM fund. WLB is great but getting a bit repetitive. I recently developed an interest in distressed desk analyst roles at BBs and wanted some advice in regards to HF and higher octane credit funds perception between the two seats. Ultimate goal is to do work with a flexible and opportunistic mandate - would doing a couple years on the desk be valuable experience or should I stick to the buyside? Appreciate all feedback.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s what you need to know:
Perception of Distressed Desk Analyst Roles:
Buy-Side vs. Sell-Side Experience:
Value of a Distressed Desk Stint:
Considerations for Transition:
In summary, while a stint on a distressed desk could be valuable for skill-building, staying on the buy-side or transitioning to a distressed-focused buy-side fund may better align with your ultimate goal of working in a flexible and opportunistic mandate.
Sources: Automation in fundamental finance roles, Q&A: Credit hedge fund analyst at MF, former BB trader, Direct Lending --> Distressed/Special Situations Investing, Q&A: VP in LO Public Credit, Q&A: I'm a London-based Distressed Debt Analyst
Bump. Literally in exact same spot
Quas consequatur eaque eum error cum aut. Eos animi quo totam libero consequatur eius molestiae cumque. Unde quasi est accusamus fuga et quis doloremque. Sapiente ut dolores quia natus facilis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...