Liquid Credit vs Distressed Desk
Hi all. For context am a liquid credit analyst currently at a 20ishB AUM fund. WLB is great but getting a bit repetitive. I recently developed an interest in distressed desk analyst roles at BBs and wanted some advice in regards to HF and higher octane credit funds perception between the two seats. Ultimate goal is to do work with a flexible and opportunistic mandate - would doing a couple years on the desk be valuable experience or should I stick to the buyside? Appreciate all feedback.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s what you need to know:
Perception of Distressed Desk Analyst Roles:
Buy-Side vs. Sell-Side Experience:
Value of a Distressed Desk Stint:
Considerations for Transition:
In summary, while a stint on a distressed desk could be valuable for skill-building, staying on the buy-side or transitioning to a distressed-focused buy-side fund may better align with your ultimate goal of working in a flexible and opportunistic mandate.
Sources: Automation in fundamental finance roles, Q&A: Credit hedge fund analyst at MF, former BB trader, Direct Lending --> Distressed/Special Situations Investing, Q&A: VP in LO Public Credit, Q&A: I'm a London-based Distressed Debt Analyst
Bump. Literally in exact same spot
Ignore title, bump
As someone that’s moderately interested in liquid credit, what makes you say it’s repetitive?
Can answer, after a while every deal looks the same something along the lines of: Cov Lite, Refi/Recap/A&E or if new paper PE fund is overpaying buying it out for 20x EBITDA, your IC Memo more or less has the same strengths/weaknesses which change moderately depending on the business and given most new deals close in 2 weeks you do a very streamlined version of DD.
Was previously in a similar seat albeit at a much larger fund and saw most people exit to some type of event driven HF. It really depends on the nature of your fund e.g. my fund had a very flexible mandate so although we were primarily underwriting your typical BSL/SSN/FRN we would also do private credit deals, 2L notes and invest in distressed names on the secondary market. Basically, depends on how much exposure you get, if you only look at 1L and have a very conservative PM (only investing in names with 6x leverage) then your exits will naturally be more limited.
Facere et maiores sunt sit repellat ut voluptatum reprehenderit. Consequuntur velit nulla libero quibusdam. Molestiae alias et quasi libero qui pariatur. Est aspernatur ut reiciendis quia sapiente.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...