Jan 08, 2026
2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, Oaktree's modeling tests, including the 3-hour model test, are generally known for their focus on building financial models under tight time constraints. Historically, these tests have included tasks like creating a 3-statement model and an LBO model, often requiring candidates to make logical assumptions due to limited information provided.

If this test is specifically labeled as "HY" (High Yield), it could indicate a focus on high-yield bond analysis or capital structure considerations. This might involve tasks such as:

  1. Analyzing High-Yield Bonds: Evaluating bond metrics like yield-to-maturity, credit spreads, and risk factors.
  2. Capital Structure Analysis: Assessing leverage, interest coverage ratios, and the impact of debt on the company's financial health.
  3. Pitch Component: If there's a pitch element, you might be asked to recommend a high-yield bond investment or propose a restructuring strategy.

While the exact format may vary, Oaktree's tests are known for being challenging and requiring a solid understanding of financial modeling, logical assumptions, and concise presentation of results. If you're preparing, brushing up on high-yield bond metrics, capital structure modeling, and LBO frameworks would be a smart move.

Sources: 2-hour Modeling Test for HF (Fundemental Equities) - What to expect?, Oaktree Modeling Test /Case Study, Two Bonds w/ Different Maturities but Same Price / Face. Which has higher yield?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/real-estate/thoughts-on-bentallgreenoak-need-update?customgpt=1

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Blanditiis consequuntur fugit non. Minus cumque a sint. Ducimus delectus et ut dolores. Cumque architecto reprehenderit quo odit quam. Voluptatem voluptate unde qui et sint. Delectus et error rerum voluptates sint eius eaque saepe.

Fugiat sunt occaecati saepe autem recusandae est rerum. Perspiciatis velit rem ut. Ut placeat pariatur eligendi. Impedit eaque et minima culpa ullam consequuntur et reprehenderit. Dolorem quisquam qui minima fugit nam eius qui molestiae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”