Aside from an easier earnings season, why leave sell side for a LO?

Have a friend who entered a respected LO out of undergrad. I entered SS ER. Same year. Our compensation progression has been almost on point though he will be capped much lower until he becomes a PM. I am curious why sell siders leave for LO as comp appears to be relatively similar at the lower levels but better for the sell side during the middle of one’s career.

7 Comments
 

anonymous_IV:

That’s because most sellside seats are dead end jobs with no chance of becoming lead analysts. So naturally people want to leave for either buyside or corporate. There’s no upside in sellside until you become a covering analyst while the cap is higher on buyside even without becoming a PM. Buyside is also viewed as more prestigious overall.


Same can be said about most buyside seats, especially LO

 

I’d bet that banks could cut the pay of everyone in sell side research by 50% and they would continue to do the same job for half as much because they have no transferable skills and few other jobs they could land would pay them as much as the reduced rate. I don’t think comp and headcount is going to fall off a cliff immediately but it’s going to erode over time.

 

Managing Director in S&T - Equities

I’d bet that banks could cut the pay of everyone in sell side research by 50% and they would continue to do the same job for half as much because they have no transferable skills and few other jobs they could land would pay them as much as the reduced rate. I don’t think comp and headcount is going to fall off a cliff immediately but it’s going to erode over time.

What kind of BS is this. Many sell siders go on to CFO positions, high profile IR roles, strategy roles, BoD roles, etc. Analysts that have been in the same sector for years can have extremely valuable perspective along with deep relationships with corporates across your covered industry. 

Your perception is skewed. Yes, there is a general lack of talent in the lower ranks and it is a problem. Most senior analysts have trouble finding associates today that want to work hard and have genuine intellectual curiosity. 

There is also unfortunately far too many young kids that have been "promoted" to covering analyst roles solely as an avenue for the bank to ask for corporate access.  Research quality in these cases in often extremely poor, but research management doesn't care because they get paid for corporate access and can pay a kid $200k to cover some stocks and they are happy. I hear management teams of the companies I cover complaining about this kind of thing all the time. 

That said, those that truly make it and have a passion for this industry (particularly at larger bulge bracket banks with actual budgets for talent) can and will continue to do quite well. 

So many people think they can do this job, but in my experience very few truly "get it". 

 
Most Helpful

The longer I do this job (8th year at a L/S HF, ignore title), the less and less I talk to sell side research. I agree there is a difference in quality between the best analysts and the junior seat fillers, but the value add from the tail end of quality sell siders is not big enough that I couldn't easily live without it. There is rarely a thesis changing piece of information that I hear from sell side that I don't either figure out for myself or learn from my buyside network before it permeates to sell side. I agree that corporate access is a useful function, but as you point out this can be done cheaply. Research quality is maybe 15-20% of the consideration in deciding where my fund's dollars go - the banks with good corporate access and poor research get paid much more than the ones with better research and poor corporate access. In terms of exits, sure, some exit to well paid corporate seats, but C-suite roles are rare and breaking 7-figures in IR is probably not common.

 

Deleniti quisquam corporis recusandae qui. Nesciunt explicabo necessitatibus consequatur quidem ipsum. Eum tempora facere commodi. Qui eligendi distinctio veritatis voluptas voluptatem magni velit accusamus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 11 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”