Detailed Revenue and Cost Builds

Struggling to understand how analysts arrive at a detailed PxQ build, or anything deeper than segment level forecasting for a business that does not provide some form revenue/cost detail by unit, user, etc. Is that the best you can do sometimes? If so, how do you quantify a variable view?

3 Comments
 

When a business doesn't provide granular revenue or cost details (e.g., by unit, user, or product), analysts often rely on creative approaches and alternative data to build a detailed PxQ (Price x Quantity) model or segment-level forecasts. Here's how you can approach it:

1. Segment-Level Forecasting as a Starting Point

  • If the company only provides segment-level data, you can start by breaking down revenue into its key drivers (e.g., price, volume, market share, etc.).
  • Use management guidance, historical trends, and industry benchmarks to estimate these drivers.

2. Alternative Data and Proxy Metrics

  • Analysts often turn to alternative data sources to fill in the gaps. For example:
    • Job postings: If a company is hiring aggressively in sales or operations, it might indicate an upcoming push for growth.
    • Credit card or email receipt data: These can provide insights into sales trends or customer behavior.
    • Market growth data: Use third-party reports to estimate the total addressable market (TAM) and the company's share within it.
  • These data points can help you decompose revenue into price, volume, and market share components.

3. Quantifying a Variable View

  • When you lack precise data, you can create a range of scenarios to quantify uncertainty:
    • Base Case: Use historical averages or management guidance.
    • Bull Case: Assume higher growth rates, better pricing power, or increased market share.
    • Bear Case: Assume slower growth, pricing pressure, or market share loss.
  • This approach allows you to present a range of outcomes and highlight the key variables driving your assumptions.

4. Granularity Through Assumptions

  • Even without unit-level data, you can make educated assumptions:
    • Revenue: Break it down into price per unit and units sold. If unit data isn't available, use proxies like customer growth, website traffic, or sales team expansion.
    • Costs: Estimate costs based on industry norms, gross margin trends, or cost structures of comparable companies.

5. Iterative Refinement

  • As you gather more data (e.g., earnings calls, management commentary, or alternative data), refine your assumptions and models.
  • Focus on key drivers that management emphasizes, such as pricing power, customer acquisition, or operational efficiency.

6. Communicating Your View

  • Be transparent about the limitations of your data and the assumptions you've made.
  • Highlight the sensitivity of your model to key variables and explain how changes in these variables impact your forecasts.

In summary, while segment-level forecasting might sometimes be the best you can do, leveraging alternative data, creating scenario analyses, and making educated assumptions can help you build a more detailed and defensible PxQ model.

Sources: Q&A: Equity Analyst at a Sovereign Wealth/Pension Fund, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/asset-management/will-asset-management-industry-just-wither-away?customgpt=1, Why a lack of advanced modeling techniques? Anyone who uses probabilistic modeling justification for this?, My PE Recruiting Process, Private Equity - Working with Imperfect Information

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Qui et mollitia enim voluptas nesciunt iure. Dolor architecto repudiandae quos ipsum maxime quia. Adipisci eos tenetur possimus. Provident ea incidunt sint dolores.

Voluptates velit architecto dicta. Sapiente qui quo laudantium. Ducimus voluptatum sit et consequatur maiores. Magni explicabo et dicta doloribus. Voluptatem veniam consequuntur adipisci non et et eum.

Aspernatur molestiae debitis dolore corporis voluptas. Quia est sed sit praesentium amet inventore. Eveniet minus consequatur dolorem. Consequuntur sint facere aut consequatur cupiditate autem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”