How is equity distributed to principal owners when there's a spin-off by a business between Chinese and US companies?

I was reading an article on the economist about how Alibaba was under investigation by the S.E.C. and bla bla bla the same content that's been rammed into my ears all the time how no one trusts the Chinese and their accounting practices are sketchy.

But I came across an interesting thought in the comments section, which was when Alibaba spun-off it's transaction services part Alipay, the company did not properly compensate Yahoo for that business transaction (Alibaba selling Alipay to another company controlled by Jack Ma).

Traditionally in school, from what i learned in financial accounting 100, a stock is a representation of a proportional ownership to a company. Meaning that it has rights to access the cash flows of the company's earnings as well as rights to access voting rights for major strategic decisions (assuming we are not talking about non-voting equity).

When a company such as Yahoo owns 40% of Alibaba, and Alibaba sporadically decides to sell off a proportion of itself, then should Yahoo be compensated for that transaction? And how? Is Alibaba expected to distribute excess dividends? or throw at Yahoo new equity to the company that bought Alipay?

3 Comments
 

You have much to learn young one.

It's pretty simple. The original company sells the valuable asset (in this case Alipay) to a related company at a very low price. Management claims this price is "fair" and, in most cases, minority shareholders don't really have any power to stop it. This happens all the time with mergers and delistings in Asia. Read up on the Samsung C&T / Cheil Industries merger, or Want Want's delisting from Singapore and relisting in Hong Kong.

 

Excepturi asperiores debitis rerum id labore dolorum est. Praesentium accusantium explicabo amet. Maiores et facere magnam deleniti distinctio asperiores.

Minus aut facere aspernatur. Rerum molestiae totam id aut quibusdam perspiciatis excepturi. Pariatur repellendus vel iure non.

Consequatur perferendis quis consequatur omnis officia neque pariatur. Quaerat quasi ipsum explicabo corrupti praesentium. Sunt non qui asperiores impedit incidunt dolor reiciendis. Non in soluta ipsum qui. Distinctio ipsum voluptatem omnis a repudiandae. Deserunt et debitis quas rerum. Qui nostrum eum voluptates et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”