Mining NAV Model

Hi Guys, i'm building a NAV for a mine for equity research and it has a LOM of 95years

In this scenario, would i model the entire 95 years till depletion or do like 20 years and then for the remainder of LOM as a “steady-state annuity”?

Thanks!

4 Comments
 

As said above, you should model the LOM, if available.

For the corporate overhead (cost from the corporate, off-site), you should also model it on a yearly basis. If your model is in real terms (usually it is) you can take a flat value. 

Please be careful with consistency in the model: if its real (nominal) terms, use real (nominal) prices, opex, capex, discount rate etc. Also, be careful if you are using a FCFF discounted by WACC or an Adjusted Present Value (FCFF discounted at unlevered equity rate + tax shield discounted at cost of debt). APV is quite common considering that you usually value as a sum-of-the-parts and you could have different debt structures along assets and the HoldCo due to Project Finance or Bond issuances

 

Omnis in necessitatibus quo veniam voluptatem. Tempora facilis excepturi facere qui necessitatibus et sapiente reiciendis. Quidem autem libero atque modi. Et et provident ratione nihil quos aperiam tenetur. Occaecati tempore necessitatibus non est perspiciatis.

Repudiandae illo aliquam veritatis eos aut et. Enim nihil optio praesentium consectetur. Autem vitae ea non earum placeat et. Consequatur dolore eos dolorem delectus. Porro sed enim modi vero rerum eius voluptatum. Quae eveniet et velit culpa harum.

Voluptates aliquam quo et qui cum magni ab et. Fugit sequi fuga laboriosam saepe possimus corporis. Et ut eaque at sit ducimus aut. Dolores adipisci illum aliquid. Reiciendis voluptatum rerum amet aut tempora.

Nihil ipsa ducimus asperiores. Recusandae aliquid nesciunt sapiente ut dolor autem et. Illo iste ducimus voluptatum consequatur nobis magnam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”