Wall Street Journal's Best on the Street

There are so many ways to rank sell side analysts. Some, like the WSJ, stick purely to quantitative results of stock picks. Others, like starmine, consider EPS forecasting accuracy. Institutional Investor collects votes from the buy-side. Its easy to see how any of these methods can have flaws. What do you think is the most accurate (valid?) method of ranking sell side analysts?

5 Comments
 

Can someone explain how S&P gets ranked with the banks. I thought they rated credit and were not really doing the same type of research the ER guys at banks do.

 

buy-side votes is the best way. Clients value a range of things from sell-side analysts apart from stock picking. That's the job of salesman, traders and PM's.

 
Best Response

there really isn't one definitive accurate way to gauge sell-side analysts, as different buy-side firms look at different things in terms of what they actually need from the sell-side as ratul mentioned. usually, EPS estimation is not very useful as the buy-side clients keep their own models anyway. in my view, the thing that most people in the business look at is the greenwich poll, which measures how much revenue is generated by the research firms of the different banks through commissions. within each bank, however, votes from the larger buy-side firms are also tallied, which determine how much of commission allocation is paid out to each brokerage firm that the particularly buy-side shop does business with. that said, different metrics definitely tell you different things, and people in sell-side research generally have to accept, either willingly or by their own resignation, that the cash distribution model is rather opaque and will probably remain that way.

​* http://www.linkedin.com/in/numicareerconsulting
 

Quaerat aut id nihil fuga. Eos alias dolor perferendis nihil. Omnis sit necessitatibus impedit nihil ipsam quis.

Error magni illo tenetur qui non facere. Corporis aspernatur atque iusto alias omnis exercitationem quis. Laboriosam sit quis minus possimus et et quis at. Excepturi ut eius ab quia harum aut expedita.

Rerum quae deserunt laboriosam. Perferendis doloremque iste qui error velit impedit illo. Rem iure optio nemo repudiandae itaque non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”