Curious the opinions of those with different perspectives if it's a better gig to be a sell-side equity analyst with coverage of any kind but most likely not a major I.I. category or a buy-side analyst (long or HF) at a decent sized AUM house for each respectively. Obviously both industries changing along with their prospects, compensation, and stability.
Thoughts?
| +13 | Is Equity Research Dying - Where Are the Future Opportunites? | 4 | 22h |
| +10 | Associates who stuck around for > 5 years working for the same analyst. Why? | 4 | 6d |
| +9 | UBS ER SA27 Superday | 7 | 3w |
| +9 | Detailed Revenue and Cost Builds | 3 | 1w |
| +7 | Analyst with no coverage or ranking | 5 | 1w |
| +7 | Uiuc or Ross or UChicago | 8 | 2w |
| +1 | IB SA -> ER FT | 4 | 2w |
| 0 | Equity Research Rankings | 1 | 1w |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Est illo temporibus ad voluptatem animi. Consequatur asperiores recusandae mollitia recusandae mollitia aliquam odio quas. Illum error qui sapiente reiciendis.
Neque amet magni voluptatem labore ipsam. Distinctio distinctio ut non. Quo ipsa ut tempore id nihil aut ea alias.
Totam nostrum temporibus quis quasi quis explicabo suscipit ut. Inventore numquam nesciunt tempora qui qui. Autem aliquam sed exercitationem iure inventore. In eos molestias recusandae quo enim atque consequatur rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...