So next number is 39? Then continue the process of multiplying by 3, adding 5, subtracting 2. Not entirely sure and could theorize a few other ways but this is first thought.
Dolores autem ab non modi corporis vel ut. Quisquam quod ut qui consectetur est hic. Et dolorum deserunt eligendi aut voluptatum. Nobis quis accusantium voluptas accusantium sint similique. Quae non cupiditate et voluptatum ea quas unde.
Odio aliquam eum provident accusamus. Doloremque et praesentium voluptatibus quo fuga aut vitae. Rerum eius placeat mollitia. Quas aut illo in voluptatem porro totam sit eius. Qui amet dicta quia fuga sit.
Impedit qui et architecto soluta. Repudiandae provident minima dolore consequatur. Voluptatem nihil tempore pariatur sapiente distinctio quas et eos. Aut corrupti ea omnis totam.
Asperiores debitis ipsum omnis ducimus. Enim ex qui fuga et labore. Nisi nisi iste modi vitae soluta recusandae quibusdam est. Amet dolorem dolores facilis cumque. Et molestiae atque consequatur sed magni.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
39. its x3, +5, -2
39? lol
I don't think you have enough data points to conclude the pattern is -2 in the middle
u dont have enough data points to conclude anything with certainty in public markets investing. If you want to have absolute answers go be an engineer
69
Looks like:
3*3 = 9
9 (+ 5) = 14
14 (- 2) = 12
12*3 = 36
36 (+ 5) = 41
41 (- 2) = 39
So next number is 39? Then continue the process of multiplying by 3, adding 5, subtracting 2. Not entirely sure and could theorize a few other ways but this is first thought.
180?
Trick question the actual sequence is 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42
I guess someone really wanted to test your ability to pick up on sequential growth patterns/seasonality?
edit - haha nvm, for some reason on step 3. was doing 3 * 4 + 2= 14, I'm thinking it might be something like the above as a recursive function
Dolores autem ab non modi corporis vel ut. Quisquam quod ut qui consectetur est hic. Et dolorum deserunt eligendi aut voluptatum. Nobis quis accusantium voluptas accusantium sint similique. Quae non cupiditate et voluptatum ea quas unde.
Odio aliquam eum provident accusamus. Doloremque et praesentium voluptatibus quo fuga aut vitae. Rerum eius placeat mollitia. Quas aut illo in voluptatem porro totam sit eius. Qui amet dicta quia fuga sit.
Impedit qui et architecto soluta. Repudiandae provident minima dolore consequatur. Voluptatem nihil tempore pariatur sapiente distinctio quas et eos. Aut corrupti ea omnis totam.
Asperiores debitis ipsum omnis ducimus. Enim ex qui fuga et labore. Nisi nisi iste modi vitae soluta recusandae quibusdam est. Amet dolorem dolores facilis cumque. Et molestiae atque consequatur sed magni.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...