Advice - IBD Mid Level VP —> HF

Hi all — looking for some views:
 

I’m currently a 4th Year VP in investment banking (Industrial Coverage) and have come to the view that a public market investing career might be a better long-term fit for me, despite the fact that I’m 34.

At a high level, what I enjoy most about my job is covering companies: understanding business models, competitive dynamics, and forming a view on value. I care very little for the execution - I find it easy but boring. As I’ve gotten more senior, the balance has tilted further in that direction, which has made me question the best path forward.

To be clear - I’m realistic about this:
 

  • I fully understand there likely will be a step back in title and comp
  • I’m aware the risk profile is higher and comp is volatile
  • I’m not under any illusion that this is an “easy” move
  • Risk adjusted return is likely lower than my current role, but the thought of running another M&A process makes me want to quit on the spot.

What I’d really appreciate advice on:

  • Are there certain types of funds (MMs, sector-focused, longer-term fundamental shops) that tend to be more open to senior backgrounds?
  • How would you position yourself if you were me?
  • Any common mistakes you’ve seen from anyone doing something similar?

I realize I’m late relative to the typical path and am approaching this with a lot of humility. Definitely open to just quitting and making a living somewhere outside finance if this doesn’t work out.


Thanks all!


 

Thanks in advance.


 

12 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s a breakdown of advice for your situation:

1. Types of Funds Open to Senior Backgrounds

  • Sector-Focused Funds: Your industrial coverage expertise is a strong asset. Funds that focus on industrials or related sectors (e.g., energy, materials, or infrastructure) may value your deep knowledge of the space.
  • Long-Term Fundamental Shops: These funds prioritize deep research and understanding of business models, competitive dynamics, and valuation—aligning well with what you enjoy most about your current role.
  • Multi-Managers (MMs): While MMs like Citadel or Millennium are more fast-paced and trading-oriented, some pods within these platforms may value your analytical skills and sector expertise. However, they often require a steep learning curve in public markets.
  • Event-Driven or Special Situations Funds: Your M&A experience could be a differentiator here, as these funds often look for professionals who understand corporate actions and restructuring.

2. Positioning Yourself

  • Leverage Your Sector Expertise: Highlight your deep understanding of industrials, including business models, competitive landscapes, and valuation frameworks. This is your edge.
  • Showcase Transferable Skills: Emphasize your ability to analyze companies, form investment theses, and assess value. Downplay the execution-heavy aspects of your IB role and focus on the strategic, analytical side.
  • Build a Public Markets Narrative: Demonstrate your interest in public markets by discussing personal investing experience, market research, or any side projects that show your ability to think like an investor.
  • Network Strategically: Reach out to alumni or contacts at funds that align with your interests. Tailor your pitch to show how your background complements their investment strategy.

3. Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Underestimating the Learning Curve: Public markets require a different skill set, including understanding market dynamics, trading, and portfolio construction. Be prepared to invest time in learning these.
  • Overemphasizing Execution Experience: Funds care more about your ability to generate investment ideas and less about your deal execution skills. Focus on your analytical and strategic thinking.
  • Not Being Humble Enough: As you mentioned, you’ll likely take a step back in title and comp. Be clear about your willingness to start at a lower level and prove yourself.
  • Ignoring Cultural Fit: Hedge funds vary widely in culture and work style. Make sure you target funds where your personality and work ethic align with their environment.

4. Actionable Steps

  • Develop a Stock Pitch: Prepare a few well-researched stock pitches in your sector to demonstrate your ability to think like an investor.
  • Learn the Language of Public Markets: Familiarize yourself with concepts like portfolio construction, risk management, and trading strategies. Consider taking courses or certifications if needed.
  • Target the Right Funds: Focus on funds that value deep fundamental research and sector expertise. Avoid those that prioritize short-term trading if that’s not your strength.
  • Leverage Your Network: Use LinkedIn, alumni networks, and industry events to connect with professionals in hedge funds. Informational interviews can provide valuable insights and open doors.

5. Final Thoughts

Your background in industrial coverage and your passion for understanding businesses give you a solid foundation for a transition to hedge funds. While the move is challenging, it’s not impossible, especially if you position yourself as a sector expert with a strong analytical mindset. Be patient, persistent, and open to learning, and you’ll increase your chances of success.

Good luck, and remember—Max the Monkey is rooting for you! 🐒

Sources: Life as a Top Asset Manager, Citi, Lazard, Jefferies, Fidelity, Morgan Stanley, Rising Junior Losing Hope and In Need of Advice, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/going-from-mm-investment-bank-to-mega-fund?customgpt=1, Credit funds

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Analyzing a company as a banker (or even a PE guy( and analyzing a company as a public market analyst are two different things altogether

My advice for tenured bankers who want to move to public market investing is to lateral to equity research or specialist sales. First you interact a lot more with hedge fund PMs and how they think (you get very little interaction in most banking roles). Second that transition is a lot more common than from banking. 

 

Managing Director in IB-M&A

Analyzing a company as a banker (or even a PE guy( and analyzing a company as a public market analyst are two different things altogether

My advice for tenured bankers who want to move to public market investing is to lateral to equity research or specialist sales. First you interact a lot more with hedge fund PMs and how they think (you get very little interaction in most banking roles). Second that transition is a lot more common than from banking. 

Agree with this.  See a decent amount of desk analysts on distressed / high-yield desks as well coming from VP/D level banking internally, same goes for asset management arms as well though more private than public focused.   

 

Very helpful. Thanks both, I’m going to look more seriously at equity research roles, think that would still give me a lot of the exposure I’m looking for and make for a transition to public investment roles in the future.


Thanks!

 

Echoing above (ignore title). See a lot of ex-bankers making the move to ER first before making the jump to buy-side publics. There’s a big disconnect in knowledge between the two and interacting with public investors helps build your own investor mindset way better than several years in banking. And being in IB, you barely scratch the surface of knowing a sector properly (speaking as someone who’s made the move from IB to ER to HF).

 
Most Helpful

I moved at senior analyst/junior associate level and wasn’t held back. Saw the same at more senior levels (e.g., senior VP). I found those going the other way around (ER to IB) get put back a year at least, or two… which made sense as they’re missing modelling, deal and LBO experience, etc. The disconnect you’d be filling is in-depth industry and company knowledge, and how public markets move more broadly, which just takes a bit of time but quicker/more doable than deal experience imo. I’d also add when making the move, try to move to a good team/work under a good analyst - sounds basic but they can really determine that part of your career and HF prospects

 

34 isn't late. I made a similar move->corporate finance to buy-side via MBA at age 30, then 15 years on the buy-side (analyst->PM->CIO).

On fund types—longer-duration fundamental shops value industry knowledge over modeling speed. Multi-managers want moldable juniors, harder path for you. Sector-focused industrials funds could be a fit given your coverage.

On positioning—leverage your sector expertise hard. You've seen dozens of industrials deals. You know which management teams are full of it, which business models actually compound, where the bodies are buried. That's sourcing edge. And you probably have a rolodex of CFOs, IR people, competitors, suppliers—that's primary research most junior analysts can't touch. PMs don't want fancy banker presentations, they want ideas that make money. Build 2-3 stock pitches in your sector that show you think like an investor—why is the market wrong, what's the catalyst, what's the risk/reward. Use those to network in. A great pitch opens more doors than a polished resume.

On mistakes—pitches that sound like sell-side research. Thorough but no edge. "Good company, well-managed, trades at 12X" isn't a pitch. "Market thinks X, I think Y, here's why and here's when it gets recognized" is.

 

Modi in unde sit atque quasi dolorem reprehenderit doloribus. Ducimus perferendis maxime praesentium sit facilis et alias. In commodi et omnis.

Aut id in soluta quam. Eaque deserunt est quia suscipit velit. Aliquam libero ut nihil doloribus aut aliquam et.

Accusantium explicabo ipsum quo qui minus voluptas occaecati. Et at rerum quis quas voluptate quia iusto. Aut voluptas sed odit consequatur. Minus ut dolorum quod corrupti aut. Ut tempora est sed sit aut.

Quidem eligendi nesciunt nihil molestias non sequi iusto. Consequatur sed praesentium explicabo repellat aut ullam placeat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”