Am I overthinking or is this guy an a-hole

Hi guys:


Im an analyst at a HF. We have 1 pm / group head, a few analysts, a few associates (junior to analysts). Analysts work on sectors and names within sectors. I cover a sector where I’ve looked at a few names in it - small sector not my main coverage. This sector has a few names that are hard to classify and overlap with another sector.  Today I received an email from another analyst that he’s going to cover XYZ name (within the gray area) and he had no discussion with me or the PM. Just an email to me and PM saying he should cover it. I responded and said this is probably best for the PM to decide and from my perspective, prefer manager to decide my coverage rather than peer. Mind you he did not discuss this at all with anyone and just decided to work on the name and let me know. It’s not a clearly defined case where does it fit - think sth like a type of service that can go into either the end market or the service type. This person has repeatedly done the same - once saying Twitter belongs to consumer sector (his area) rather than tech, another time saying  he had been talking to a few people on a name even though manager than assigned it to me. I think I made it pretty clear a few times in professional language this seems to be managers job to decide, not his job. Am I over thinking , or is this guy just an a-hole? What are practical ways to navigate the behavior? PM / HR don’t care. Thanks

5 Comments
 
Most Helpful

"small sector not my main coverage", "PM / HR don’t care.". There you go you have your answer. Either:

  • Do nothing.
  • Or feed him as many vague names as possible, let him chew up as many unrelated names and stretch him thin. When you have to deal with all sorts of business models, analysis quality dilutes. His performance will bleed eventually.
 

Voluptas beatae explicabo qui iusto fugiat saepe vel quam. Qui quaerat et officia neque impedit. Id excepturi ullam est maiores.

Earum odit illo aut commodi. Eius perspiciatis non consequatur repudiandae dolor quia ipsam. Sunt voluptatem doloribus sed omnis autem voluptas in ad.

Ut dignissimos vitae nobis quia. Iusto sit quia laborum fugiat aut sint. Voluptatum modi delectus ut debitis.

Qui et eligendi id quo debitis aut numquam. Consequuntur qui adipisci ex ipsum. Porro error excepturi sunt dicta atque ipsa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $355
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $193
  • Analysts (235) $177
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (277) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”