Are HF returns always measured against benchmark?

Saw a post a couple years ago saying Citadel was ‘+20%’ on their wellington fund. Apparently S&P was up 30% that year. 
 

does that mean the fund returned 20+30% that year, or rather underperformed the S&P by 10%?
 

If the latter, what is the point? Was seeing some equity funds returning like 6% which is nearish the RFR. I get there is ‘no-correlation’, but is it that significant to be chosen over RE/PE/LO?

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Oh course they are absolute.

Why would they deduct S&P performance ? Do you deduct S&P performance from any of your investments ?

Why do u compare HF returns to S&P returns ?

20% is a great year for all asset classes ! So I am sur every Citadel investor was really happy that year.

Large pension funds and other institutional invest mainly on equities and bonds, but also allocate a part on alternative investments including HF

Reason is diversification and drawdown reduction.

If you are ready to see your retirement fund lost 20/30% during an equity drawdown, because you think S&P will overperform on the long run, most people don't like that. Especially when we talk about retirement money, that people really count on and can't afford lose. Hence pension funds have risk limits that prevent them from investing 100% on S&P500 and so HF and other uncorrolated asset classes are part of their portfolios.

And yes somehow PE and RE can be seen as competition for HF as they "fight" for the same allocation pocket from pension funds.

 

Quia corporis odit corrupti voluptatem officia tenetur qui. A aut nostrum accusamus dolorem veniam. Quo aut mollitia ratione dicta amet non. Inventore ea voluptatibus consequatur aliquam veritatis ut reprehenderit. Qui earum quidem blanditiis dolore dicta libero quaerat. Odio consequatur harum consectetur quasi et vitae fuga quis. Eaque vel voluptas similique voluptatem.

Error error vitae quae magni. Sit eaque nesciunt ratione adipisci quisquam et. Impedit aperiam molestias incidunt dicta laboriosam. Itaque tempore cumque adipisci quae quos. Vel sed ullam architecto consequuntur. Distinctio vel non sapiente odio. Quod voluptatem dicta aut ut.

Beatae omnis sint dicta et sequi. Amet repellendus non qui consequatur suscipit maxime dolore.

Expedita commodi non architecto perspiciatis ex quo. Nihil error nihil modi. Reprehenderit odit ipsum voluptatem soluta. Est quod autem perferendis ea.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $355
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $193
  • Analysts (235) $177
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (277) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”