Best Path Into Public Investing?

My background is 2 years of software IB (firmly software sponsor coverage so lot's of sell-sides & buy-side mandates targeting sponsors), 2 Y of MM PE (generalist / SW) and 1 year of strat fin at PE PortCo (portco I covered) - staying isn't an option given some headcount constraints & terrible pay. 

I've been recruiting the past few months and been unsuccessful getting into HF. I think part of the reason is b/c of my already atypical background of the PE Portco detour.

My current actionable options are

a) strat fin / corp dev @ pre-IPO SW company

b) going back to same bank as an associate and doing SW sponsor coverage

If my long term goal is to still break into public equity investing in some capacity (LO, whatever it may be), what path would you recommend? 

2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s a breakdown of your situation and actionable advice:

  1. Understanding the Challenge:
    Your background is diverse, but the detour into PE PortCo strat fin might be perceived as a deviation from the traditional path into public investing. Hedge funds and public equity roles often value a more linear trajectory, such as IB → HF or IB → PE → HF. However, your software-focused experience is a strong asset, especially for funds with a tech focus.

  2. Option A: Strat Fin/Corp Dev at Pre-IPO Software Company:

    • This path could be beneficial if the company is high-profile and you can leverage the experience to build a narrative around understanding growth-stage businesses and market dynamics.
    • However, transitioning from corp dev/strat fin to public investing is less common and might require additional networking and positioning.
  3. Option B: Returning to IB as an Associate in Software Sponsor Coverage:

    • This option aligns more closely with traditional paths into public investing. Returning to IB would allow you to rebuild momentum and position yourself for HF recruiting, especially if you can focus on software/tech deals.
    • Additionally, IB experience is often viewed as a strong foundation for public equity roles, as it demonstrates analytical rigor and deal experience.
  4. Recommendation:

    • If your long-term goal is public equity investing, Option B is likely the better choice. It provides a clearer path to hedge funds or long-only roles, especially if you can leverage your software expertise.
    • While Option A might offer interesting experience, it could make the transition to public investing more challenging and require additional steps to bridge the gap.
  5. Additional Tips:

    • Networking: Reach out to professionals in public equity roles, particularly those with a tech focus, to understand their paths and seek referrals.
    • Positioning: Highlight your software expertise and deal experience in your story. Emphasize how this makes you uniquely qualified to analyze and invest in tech companies.
    • Recruiting Strategy: Target funds with a tech focus or those that value operational experience, as your PortCo background could be an asset in these cases.

By choosing the IB route and strategically networking, you can better position yourself for a successful transition into public equity investing.

Sources: Breakdown of Post-IB Exit Opportunities, HF to PE post-MBA - my story and seeking advice (long-time poster)!, Worse than IB?, Why do you think public equity is more interesting than private equity?, No PE in my PA

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Optio est similique quae aut enim. Dolorem cumque itaque nemo nulla numquam aut. Et quia fugiat tempora totam. Qui eveniet voluptas dolorem et velit. Iste maiores quis ipsa omnis debitis dolore culpa veniam. Maxime est mollitia debitis ut dolor eligendi.

Quis et velit aliquam incidunt. Eos ut perspiciatis est quos fugiat quasi. Nisi sit qui dolorem. Velit beatae quo ad quis. Veritatis dolores est ut ut iure enim voluptatem.

Est molestiae amet repellat facere molestias est vero. Magnam veritatis fugit dolor adipisci. Quod aut odit et nihil at tempore quam.

Quidem est molestiae quos nostrum eligendi. Earum quisquam aliquam et voluptatibus. Blanditiis assumenda ut sit laboriosam id et nesciunt. Omnis nostrum cumque ad debitis nemo modi laudantium. Inventore debitis ex laboriosam impedit quos ipsam aliquid sed.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $355
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (235) $177
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”