Comp for new LO Fund

Brand new long only concentrated equity fund with ~$180million AUM, 2 partners, and I’d be the sole analyst with 2 partners above me (I have 2 years IB + 1 year PE), going to a tier 2 market (Austin/Chicago).

Any idea on expected comp in terms of base, bonus, equity, carry etc, or what I should ask for? Really appreciate this, thank you.

Edit: Aum is actually ~$180 million, not previously stated 42.

25 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s what you should consider:

  1. Base Salary: For a sole analyst role at a new fund with ~$42M AUM, your base salary might be on the lower end compared to larger funds. A reasonable expectation could be in the range of $100K–$150K, given your 2 years in IB and 1 year in PE.

  2. Bonus: Bonuses at smaller funds are often tied to fund performance. You could expect a discretionary bonus of 0–100% of your base salary, depending on how the fund performs.

  3. Carry/Equity: Since this is a small, concentrated fund and you’re the sole analyst, you should negotiate for a share of the carry or equity. Smaller funds often offer carry to incentivize key team members. A carry percentage of 1–2% could be a good starting point to negotiate, with potential for growth as the fund scales.

  4. Other Considerations:

    • Tier 2 Market Adjustment: Austin and Chicago are less expensive than NYC or SF, so comp might be slightly lower, but the cost of living adjustment works in your favor.
    • Growth Potential: Highlight your role as the sole analyst and the value you bring to the fund. This could justify a higher base or better carry terms.
    • Co-Invest Opportunities: If the fund allows, negotiate for the ability to co-invest alongside the partners.

Make sure to have a conversation about expected progression under various return scenarios and clarify how your contributions will be rewarded as the fund grows. Good luck!

Sources: Q&A: HF Analyst @ $5bn+ Fund - Breaking In and Transition to Risk-Taking Role, Large hedge fund analyst compensation, base/bonus 1st year analyst at HF, IB Associate with PE Offer (package question), Interview with Simple As...Hedge Fund Analyst

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

42MM LO dude they’re prob charging cheap fees since they’re LO and new. But even at 2 + 20 in a decent yr where u net 20% they’re only making 2.52m pre expenses where would they find more money to give u…

 

Currently at a first time fund that's bigger... I'd say don't do it unless you REALLY REALLY like the team and think they can raise money quickly.

 

It’s difficult to give you definitive advice without a deeper understanding of your personal financial situation and the specifics of the LO. However, based on the information provided, some concerns emerge.


If you have substantial savings and a high-risk tolerance, joining a new fund could potentially be lucrative. However, the limited information suggests this particular LO may struggle to scale. Many emerging managers with impressive backgrounds successfully secure seed funding of at least $100 million or more from established institutions. One guy who just started his own fund was seeded with $400mm from a well-known bank. Many large LPs have minimum investment thresholds that would preclude them from considering a fund of this size. Meaningful access to institutional LPs typically requires a fund size exceeding $1 billion. They can only be 10% of total AUM and they usually want to write a minimum of a $100mm check. At the $40 million mark, the fund's investor base is likely comprised primarily of family offices, a landscape that has become increasingly competitive and challenging.


If the firm's founder has a proven track record and strong relationships within the family office community, and you have confidence in their ability to scale the fund, the ground-floor opportunity might be worth considering. However, the current fundraising level suggests this may not be the case. Even with a reasonable starting salary, the risk associated with joining this LO seems disproportionately high, given the limited information available.
 

 

I attempted to provide a thoughtful and measured response, highlighting the challenges this $40 million fund faces in terms of scaling. It is going to be nearly impossible for this to work out. If you can personally take the risk and feel this opportunity will set, you up for a better seat in the future that is a reason to consider taking it. Most likely this fund will fail in 1-2 years.  

 

Your comp at $42mn needs to include some of the economics - thats the only real reason to take this job. You want at least like 10% for the risk of joining this kind of shop imo.
 

Typically if its this small they do 120-150 base and % on the GP... mostly because there isnt enough AUM to have a discretionary bonus otherwise, and the career risk is high. 

The other problem is this is a LO, and well, there isn't a ton of reasons to give money to a LO with $42mn in AUM so scaling will be tough. Also your fees won't be that high, maybe like 1/10 best case right.. especially with early investor breaks. 

Listen, they may make it... but the probability this stays in the $50mn-$80mn range forever with no new investor flows is exceptionally high, and without a % on economics and the liklihood of being a dead end, just not worth it. 

 

Ducimus qui est pariatur praesentium qui doloremque. Necessitatibus vel velit recusandae repellat nihil aliquam officiis. Eos et vel autem sint quis reprehenderit et.

 
Most Helpful

Dolor alias non voluptatem nemo aperiam cum quia qui. Qui esse assumenda beatae nam quia impedit. Quaerat dolorem necessitatibus numquam delectus error tenetur. Optio quia necessitatibus necessitatibus neque eum sed. Quaerat sed numquam animi numquam aut voluptas.

Reiciendis alias sint repudiandae nesciunt dolore. Consequatur iusto nulla quae deleniti omnis repellat. Maxime aut doloribus omnis voluptas dolor.

Sit culpa totam nihil est optio et. Quod enim ea dolorem mollitia aut.

Et voluptatem eum consectetur. Enim et explicabo optio reiciendis. Nisi sint id cumque sequi quia deleniti.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”