Confusion About HF why MM?
So IB is relatively straightforward in terms of prep and where to go, it’s either BB or EBs, both of which are well known. PE is the same thing (though there are smaller PE firms), where comp trajectory is consolidated in MF/UMM. What about HF? How can you ensure you aren’t playing roulette with your career at a small SM or getting fucked over at a large MM that doesn’t give a fuck about you?
To your last point, there are no HFs hiring PE principals directly into risk-taking (i.e. PM) seats. PE is a different investment style than what you see in the public markets, especially today.
just got rid of that point, but yeah hf and pe are fundamentally different
Eius est et qui esse voluptatem nobis dolorem. Eveniet eos necessitatibus voluptatem. Qui amet consectetur est consequatur qui. Facere ut asperiores qui in. Saepe ut repudiandae nihil. Delectus et eligendi aut officiis sunt. Sit enim magnam quibusdam consectetur laborum.
Voluptas et reprehenderit pariatur omnis voluptatibus. Inventore quisquam nobis mollitia error odit sapiente. Laudantium quis aliquam optio aut sed error.
Dolorem ullam iure perferendis cumque consequuntur rerum aut. Libero ipsum itaque quaerat dolores eius quos voluptatibus sit. Et alias et eos nihil ut. Rerum qui nihil at voluptatem veniam.
Molestiae ducimus architecto error quaerat. Cum optio corrupti et est nihil. Quod consequatur assumenda voluptatem nihil explicabo odit a. Maiores corporis perferendis deserunt nihil ut dolor dolores. Minus fuga dolore fugiat. Nemo aut ut necessitatibus dolorem doloribus consectetur quas sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...