Crossover fund or Traditional L/S

How exactly does crossover fund works? Does anyone know how much these funds allocate for each strategy (private / public) ?

Would also love to hear the pros and cons of Crossover vs L/S.

Any notable firms doing crossover? Comps? Culture? WLB?

3 Comments
 

Crossover funds are investment vehicles that operate across both private and public markets, blending strategies to capitalize on opportunities in both spaces. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:

How Crossover Funds Work

  • Private Investments: These funds invest in private companies, often in late-stage venture capital or growth equity rounds. The goal is to capture value before these companies go public.
  • Public Investments: They also invest in public equities, leveraging their insights from private markets to identify undervalued or high-growth opportunities.

Allocation Between Private and Public Strategies

The allocation between private and public investments varies significantly by fund and market conditions. Some funds may lean heavily into private investments during periods of high IPO activity, while others maintain a more balanced approach. Unfortunately, specific percentages for allocation are not detailed in the WSO dataset.

Pros and Cons: Crossover vs. Traditional L/S

Crossover Funds

Pros: - Broader Opportunity Set: Access to both private and public markets allows for diversified strategies. - Information Edge: Insights from private investments can inform public market decisions and vice versa. - High Growth Potential: Investing in private companies pre-IPO can yield significant returns if the company performs well post-IPO.

Cons: - Illiquidity: Private investments are less liquid compared to public equities. - Complexity: Managing both private and public portfolios requires expertise in two distinct areas. - Valuation Challenges: Private investments often lack transparent pricing, making valuation more subjective.

Traditional Long/Short (L/S) Funds

Pros: - Liquidity: Public markets offer greater liquidity, allowing for quicker adjustments to positions. - Risk Management: The ability to short stocks provides a hedge against market downturns. - Focus: Specialization in public markets can lead to deeper expertise in equity analysis.

Cons: - Limited Scope: Restricted to public markets, missing out on private market opportunities. - Market Dependency: Performance is more directly tied to public market conditions.

Notable Firms Doing Crossover

While the WSO dataset doesn't explicitly list crossover funds, firms like Tiger Global, Coatue Management, and Dragoneer Investment Group are well-known for their crossover strategies. These firms have a reputation for strong deal flow in both private and public markets.

Comps, Culture, and Work-Life Balance (WLB)

  • Comps: Compensation at crossover funds is typically competitive, often aligning with top-tier hedge funds or private equity firms. Bonuses are heavily tied to fund performance.
  • Culture: The culture can vary widely but is often described as fast-paced and demanding, given the dual focus on private and public markets.
  • WLB: Work-life balance tends to be challenging, especially during periods of high deal activity or market volatility. Analysts and associates may face long hours and tight deadlines.

If you're considering a career in crossover funds, it's essential to weigh the dynamic nature and growth potential against the challenges of managing dual strategies.

Sources: Why Are Fund of Funds looked down upon?, What Happens when a PE Fund Closes?, Differences between Co-invest and Secondaries?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/the-only-post-about-active-investing-you-will-ever-need-to-read?customgpt=1, Troubled fundraising processes

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Qui accusamus earum distinctio et. Asperiores ut quod eius quae aut exercitationem. Quas quae ut officiis officiis sed sunt. Et et aliquam incidunt voluptatem laboriosam fugit. Hic dolores sint deleniti dolor soluta qui. Accusantium quae ut sed non odit ipsum reiciendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”