Delete

………..……………………………..……………………………..……………………………..……………………………..……………………………..……………………………..……………………………..……………………………..……………………

17 Comments
 

When expressing returns for short positions, the most helpful WSO content suggests the following considerations:

  1. IRR (Internal Rate of Return):
    IRR can be used to measure the return on short positions, but it requires careful handling of cash flows. The upfront cash received from the short sale can be treated as an inflow, and subsequent cash outflows (e.g., covering the short position) are included. However, as you noted, the cost basis is variable and depends on the future price of the security, which complicates the calculation. IRR is particularly useful if you want to account for the time value of money and compare returns across different time horizons.

  2. MOIC (Multiple on Invested Capital):
    MOIC is less commonly used for short positions because it doesn't account for the time value of money. However, it can still provide a straightforward measure of the return by comparing the total profit or loss to the initial cash inflow from the short sale. This is simpler but less precise than IRR.

  3. Combining Shorts with Longs (Arbitrage):
    When combining a short position with a long investment (e.g., in arbitrage strategies), the return metrics should ideally reflect the combined cash flows of both positions. IRR is often the preferred metric in such cases because it can handle the complexity of multiple cash flow streams and their timing. However, you must carefully model the cash flows for both the long and short positions to ensure accuracy.

  4. Cash Flow Treatment:

    • The cash received upfront from the short sale is typically considered an inflow, but it may be restricted or subject to margin requirements, which could affect how you model it.
    • Future cash outflows to cover the short position are treated as negative cash flows. The variability of the cost basis (due to changes in the security's price) adds complexity, making IRR a more dynamic and accurate measure compared to MOIC.

In summary, IRR is generally the best way to express returns for short positions, especially when combined with long investments, as it accounts for the time value of money and the variability of cash flows. However, the complexity of modeling these cash flows accurately should not be underestimated.

Sources: Shorting Stocks: My Research Process & 7 Rules I Follow, What is the Shorting "Research" Process, Relationship among Cap Rate, IRR, Discount rate and NPV, Real Estate Private Equity Technical Qs, How do you compute IRR without any negative cash flows?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

It’s just going to be the % change between the price you shorted at and the price you covered at. 

Maybe because my trade horizons are shorter, but I’ve never expressed a return through IRR or MOIC

 
Funniest

We use a proprietary function called the proportionate trade return curve

δ = (α-η)/α

Effectively, this allows you to express the short's return (δ) as a function of the price delta (α-η) and as a proportionate figure to the original price you shorted at (α)

It's nifty because if you multiply it by 100, you can express it as a proportion of 100.

 

That’s fine I have no problem using standard lingo. Was just trying to understand how people view measuring returns on shorts.

And others in this thread clearly didn’t seem to agree that moic = percentage change so was just wanting to clarify that point and understand if I was missing something. As a matter of presentation, if your point is that it is cleaner to write 8.6% gain as opposed to 1.086x, then I certainly agree as well. But concept-wise the same.

 

Neque nobis nam voluptates explicabo et unde quas tenetur. Nostrum illum quasi assumenda minima architecto non voluptatem quis. Eligendi fugit culpa repudiandae accusamus illum. Officia reiciendis accusamus modi esse. Eligendi fuga ratione quia suscipit eos illum dolores. Minima ratione quia quia vero repudiandae. Odit nisi dolores maxime perferendis.

incentives trumph ethics

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”