For those that have worked at both LO’s and HFs, why do you think LOs consistently underperform?
Are they too sleepy? Poor incentive structure? Talent drain? Multi-strats shrinking alpha pools? Curious anyone’s thoughts
Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
| +24 | Disciplined but sad / feeling burnt out | 8 | 11h |
| +11 | How is deferred comp invested in hedge funds that use a pod structure? | 2 | 4d |
| +7 | Are Big4 MMHF grad programs still worth it? | 3 | 6h |
| +6 | Point 72 Referrals | 3 | 5d |
| +6 | Albar capital? | 0 | 18h |
| +5 | Back office keeping messing things up | 2 | 1d |
| +3 | Linonia Partnership | 3 | 1d |
| +3 | Lone Pine Co-CIO Leaves for Atreides | 2 | 2d |
Career Resources
you get paid on aum and hugging the inde,x not to take risk and find alpha
so incentives
You can't underperform the benchmark if you don't have a benchmark
Iusto vel ipsum praesentium qui. Perferendis ea praesentium perspiciatis tempore. Non et et officia tempore optio necessitatibus consequatur. Nemo vel quia laborum est et voluptatem dolor.
Recusandae voluptatem perspiciatis dicta ut. Unde quasi corrupti dolores corporis incidunt nihil. Ad sed assumenda optio quasi sequi quo autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...