Force ranking across sectors
I force rank my coverage by sub-sector and we have general allocations for sub-sectors that help size trades. I was talking to a buddy whose pod is effectively generalist and he said that they force rank across sector groupings. It’s not like utes and CPG in the same buckets but utes would be with A&D, multis, O&G, etc. Assuming revisions is the key driver, a 10% revision for a utility is way different than a similar revision for like an LTL or E&P. How do you compare across sectors? Do you capitalize the revision at like current multiple to get % value change vs cons and compare? It’s easy enough to account for subsector sentiment but how would you control across sectors?
When force ranking across sectors, especially in a generalist pod, the key is to normalize and standardize metrics to allow for meaningful comparisons. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s how you might approach it:
Capitalizing Revisions:
Adjusting for Sector-Specific Sentiment:
Normalizing Across Sectors:
Framework for Comparison:
Consider Sector-Specific Nuances:
By combining these quantitative and qualitative approaches, you can create a robust framework for force ranking across sectors while accounting for their unique characteristics.
Sources: Beginners Guide to Valuation and Metrics By Sector, Beginners Guide to Valuation and Metrics By Sector, Reflections from year 4 as an equity analyst, Performance of Top Tier vs. Bottom Tier Analysts (Q&A in Comments), Private Equity Recruiting Process (From Banking)
Would imagine they back into some form of z score for the revision. Implied earnings move is X, we’re at Y% beat/miss. Size it Y/X relative - this corrects for the revision differences you called out between E&P and utes
Still not exactly sure what the question is - why do the sectors need to be force ranked in a mkt neutral book? Can u not just force rank conviction on individual names for sizing? Or is there sector beta being taken? If sector beta then revisions not even really the driver anymore
Unrelated, but if you’re the analyst trying to cover all three of A&D Utes and E&P in mkt neutral I feel sorry for you
Est eos doloremque repellat. Iusto veritatis fuga repellat mollitia est consectetur. Et ea eos natus a ut sed. Non vero ut possimus libero iste sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...