Goldman's risk arb alums - why so many closures?

As tiger cubs have entered the spotlight recently for their overall success, i'm reminded of another prolific HF family tree: rubin's risk arb cubs. Seems like a lot of them (that have once been successful) have fallen on hard times and have shut down / dwindled in assets. Can anyone knowledgeable explain why? Were they just 1 strategy wonders that weren't able to adapt? Seems interesting that such a successful group had such a stark turn of events.

Funds that shut down or are a shell of their former selves: ESL, Eton Park, Perry, TPG axon, the group that went to KKR

Unless I'm missing any others, the only one that seems to be doing alright are Farallon and Och Ziff.

So 5/7 that used to run multiple billions are now closed or family offices

 

Dunno how well they're doing, but Taconic is also from that group and seem to still be around in size

And their returns kind of suck

I used to do Asia-Pacific PE (kind of like FoF). Now I do something else but happy to try and answer questions on that stuff.
 

Might be way off base here...

Don’t some Tiger cubs just have crazy tech exposure? Consider their long plays on tech. How many of them have actually done significantly better returns/vol wise than e.g. a simple portfolio of top x tech stocks weighted by market cap with biannual/quarterly rebalance ?

Basically, how much of the game is performing well within a certain sector vs happening to align yourself with the right factors? If e.g. tech starts to do badly and another industry starts booming and these places call it in time I’d be a  more impressed, until that happens I’m not entirely convinced that there’s much more going on than  some survivorship bias.

 

Enim blanditiis voluptas tempore veritatis. Temporibus soluta voluptatum distinctio praesentium officia consequuntur. Sunt possimus et ducimus. Perferendis explicabo reprehenderit est voluptatum adipisci qui cumque libero.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (23) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”