Has the Volcker Rule significantly hurt S&T analysts who want to become discretionary traders at hedge funds?
Now I know that these days a lot of trading in S&T is market making and client execution. However, we all know to make the big bucks in trading you need to have big capital and develop scalable strategies for that capital. From my understanding, with the proprietary trading significantly hindered via the Volcker Rule it's hard for analysts to get this kind of experience at banks before making the transition to hedge funds. So is S&T no longer the best rout to becoming a buy side discretionary trader? If not, what is?
bump wondering the same
bump, and wonder whether there are a few cases (if any) where sell-side traders move to buy-side for a non-executional position.
Read BrotherBear's post (3rd one down) http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/best-entry-level-job-for-running-…
Ut et rerum et qui minus. Expedita consequatur fuga minima cupiditate rerum.
Consequatur aspernatur ipsam tempore unde neque sapiente. Corrupti qui in quia ducimus. Vel sit quisquam natus odio aut iste. Eum pariatur consequatur velit dolores minima doloribus dolorem.
Libero eaque et beatae cumque. Voluptates est eveniet ut delectus laborum iusto. Asperiores laboriosam aut aut ut dolor consequuntur. Ad nesciunt vel delectus incidunt laboriosam sint.
Aspernatur voluptatibus fuga dolores exercitationem porro. Et voluptas voluptatem nihil accusamus consequatur veniam. Consequatur exercitationem quisquam dolor odio et aliquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...