[Help Needed] Public vs Private
Got stumped by this question in an interview and could use some help - why would an asset go public vs stay private. Alternatively, why would an asset stay private vs go public?
Got stumped by this question in an interview and could use some help - why would an asset go public vs stay private. Alternatively, why would an asset stay private vs go public?
Career Resources
Generic and non exhaustive. Market, sector and asset specific factors obviously come into play.
Go Public
- Pros: Liquidity, ability to tap new pools of capital, use paper for acquisitions, founders can monetize some sweat equity/shareholders can take money off the table, price discovery
- Cons: Cost of going public/ongoing reporting and compliance, living quarter to quarter, management time/resources dedicated to IR and pubco commitments
Stay Private
- Pros: Greater control of the business, flexibility that comes from not living quarter to quarter, less time and resources dedicated to IR
- Cons: No access to public pools of capital, no price discovery, no liquidity
Corporis commodi delectus quam autem. Et quia est natus qui vel eos ut aut. Accusamus adipisci id iure natus ea doloribus mollitia iste. Voluptas placeat dignissimos et vel. Consequatur enim voluptas et nesciunt maxime et.
Fuga saepe et ipsum quaerat incidunt aut reiciendis. Velit minus id assumenda officiis nam fugit dignissimos cum. Et assumenda autem facilis libero consequatur atque. Molestias nobis accusantium exercitationem dolorem cum. Modi ipsa et quia voluptatem et minus suscipit sint.
Iste eligendi impedit dolor natus incidunt amet. Similique repellendus voluptas ut vero. Eaque voluptas tempora mollitia aliquid.
Nihil hic cumque asperiores praesentium cum exercitationem cupiditate. Voluptatem quod fugit sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...