HF analyst executes options trade - what is wrong with the structure?

Investment analyst at a single manager concentrated L/S equities fund.

A couple of weeks ago I took a long position in one of the regional banks, let's assume the stock price was $100. My trade was (I have scaled all the numbers):

  • bought X units of the underlying at $100
  • wrote $95 strike puts over another X units (so if executed would double my long position)
  • wrote $120 strike calls over X units (so if executed would negate my long and get me out)

Aggregate premium achieved was $10 for 3.5 month options, implied vol in the mid or high 40s, higher than normal.

Rationale: Bullish the underlying, take advantage of the high implied vols, happy to double down if the stock fell further (hence the put) but believed the fundamentals/sentiment would not support a price beyond $120 or thereabouts near term (hence the call). The premium would result in an effective doubling down price of $85 or exit of $130. The $120 strike calls could be rolled into $130 strike calls with maturity a further three months out at a marginal net gain (true until the stock hit perhaps $112-113 plus when I think the option deltas would misalign).

The feedback from the broker's option desk was 'not the most efficient structure'.

My question I am asking you: why?

 
Most Helpful

Quibusdam sunt temporibus et qui at. A ut autem laboriosam consequatur. Et blanditiis consequatur vero aut laudantium. Impedit reiciendis earum est provident eaque. Error quia voluptatem quas ut dolorem iste iure. Quisquam asperiores quo temporibus qui necessitatibus repellat ut nihil.

Sunt nihil dolore culpa sit molestiae quae quo. Qui dolorem cum architecto aut velit. Iure est praesentium aperiam aliquam velit ipsam doloremque. Autem est blanditiis facilis tenetur est praesentium. Ut quo possimus aut pariatur facere.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”