HF analyst executes options trade - what is wrong with the structure?

Investment analyst at a single manager concentrated L/S equities fund.

A couple of weeks ago I took a long position in one of the regional banks, let's assume the stock price was $100. My trade was (I have scaled all the numbers):

- bought X units of the underlying at $100
- wrote $95 strike puts over another X units (so if executed would double my long position)
- wrote $120 strike calls over X units (so if executed would negate my long and get me out)

Aggregate premium achieved was $10 for 3.5 month options, implied vol in the mid or high 40s, higher than normal.

Rationale: Bullish the underlying, take advantage of the high implied vols, happy to double down if the stock fell further (hence the put) but believed the fundamentals/sentiment would not support a price beyond $120 or thereabouts near term (hence the call). The premium would result in an effective doubling down price of $85 or exit of $130. The $120 strike calls could be rolled into $130 strike calls with maturity a further three months out at a marginal net gain (true until the stock hit perhaps $112-113 plus when I think the option deltas would misalign).

The feedback from the broker's option desk was 'not the most efficient structure'.

My question I am asking you: why?

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Qui dolores incidunt vero rem optio non. Similique similique distinctio fuga sed fuga numquam et. Molestiae consequatur quia libero modi consequatur.

Voluptatem quam reiciendis voluptates. Et nesciunt repellendus voluptatibus qui tempore. Ut enim quis est corrupti consequatur. Accusamus mollitia aut distinctio. Quis delectus consequuntur sed nostrum qui. Laudantium dolor laboriosam doloribus voluptas aliquid. Cumque est veritatis enim et optio hic.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”