HF reference check

How important is the reference check before offer stage?

What does the hiring firm wants to know exactly? I meant the references I provide would be someone that's close / will speak highly of me, right? Or is it more about finding out fit / working style?

How do you guys manage it? Do you call up your previous colleagues / boss and brief them what to say or just let them do it?

10 Comments
 

Reference checks in the hedge fund (HF) hiring process are crucial but often serve as a "check-the-box" step rather than a dealbreaker, provided there are no red flags. Here's what you need to know:

  1. Importance of Reference Checks:
    Reference checks are typically conducted after the hiring firm has already made up its mind about you. They are more of a formality to confirm their decision rather than a deciding factor. However, if something negative or unexpected comes up, it could impact the offer.

  2. What the Hiring Firm Wants to Know:

    • Validation of Skills and Experience: They want to ensure that your resume and interview claims align with your actual performance and capabilities.
    • Work Style and Fit: They may ask about your working style, how you handle pressure, and how you interact with colleagues.
    • Reputation: They might also inquire about your reputation within the industry or your previous firm.
  3. Who Should Be Your References:

    • Ideally, your references should be people who are close to you professionally and will speak highly of you.
    • They should be credible individuals, such as senior colleagues, managers, or mentors, who can vouch for your skills and character.
  4. Managing the Process:

    • Briefing Your References: It’s a good idea to give your references a heads-up. Let them know about the role you’re pursuing and the key points you’d like them to emphasize.
    • Avoid Over-Engineering: While you can guide them on what to highlight, avoid scripting their responses. Authenticity is key, and hiring firms can often detect overly rehearsed answers.
    • Reputation Beyond Named References: Be aware that some funds may reach out to other people in your network or at your previous firm without informing you. Maintaining a solid reputation across the board is essential.

In summary, reference checks are important but usually not the sole determinant of an offer. Focus on selecting strong references, briefing them appropriately, and ensuring your professional reputation is solid.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/then-and-now-compbanker?customgpt=1, Private Equity Reference Check, Finishing 1st Year as HF Analyst - Ask Anything, PE Interview Question: What is the most important piece of information about a company (if you had to select one thing)?, Finishing 1st Year as HF Analyst - Ask Anything

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

They've already decided they want to hire you, the referencing is to filter out the left tail of worst outcomes.

Pick someone you've actually worked with that has reasonably good things to say about you. What you want to avoid is that they find out you were actually fired from your previous job and didn't tell them, that you burnt bridges so badly with your previous colleagues that no one is willing to say anything good about you, or that you never actually worked there and your whole CV was a lie. All of these do happen.

It's worth making sure that they know what's on your CV and what you claimed you did at your previous job.

 

I've had reference checks after an official offer that turned out to be check the box exercises

I've also had reference checks after a verbal (but prior to official offer) that turned out to be absolute grill sessions.. one of my references told me he was sweating by the end of the call

Give the references a heads up.. you could brief them what to say as in same message you told your new employer but that's about it. Not much you can do besides that

 

I only asked my references once what exactly they were asked.

In that case, it was an online survey with a bunch of generic prompts and free text fields.

Seems my references basically entered 100% made up stuff without even looking at my resume again. Still, it apparently took quite some time to complete.

No issues.

So I guess all they're testing for: are there bridges that this person hasn't burned? Haha.

I felt sorry after, given it was such a bullshit exercise.

 

have also been asked to provide references BEFORE making an offer (after case study, and meeting everyone onsite though). 
Is it normal practice to provide references first before seeing the offer? I'm asking is because I have been asked about this a few times, the first time, the fund decides to not hire anyone eventually, the second time they presented a ridiculously low offer that's obviously not a good fit... that's why I now have to ask my former boss for a 3rd time and have a bit of PTSD... what if it doesn't work out?

So just wanted to check everyone's experience - is it normal to provide references before final offer? and how do you handle it?  After all, it's hard to know if it's a fund you'll eventually join until discussing comp and asking follow-up questions such as marketing doc and written research, which usually happens after the offer stage, right?

 

ideally you're having comp expectation discussions in the early stages to know whether or not either party wants to proceed with the process... and part of the interview process is for you to ask them questions and see whether it makes sense to proceed with further rounds or not... it's a two way process. Don't wait until the end or waste time to only be let down at the end

 

Ad consequatur commodi doloribus sint. Iste ut autem delectus fugiat. Molestiae quam accusamus repellendus. Dolorem architecto nulla accusamus.

Qui deserunt temporibus saepe voluptates recusandae quo qui. Qui saepe totam in illum.

Consectetur nobis dolores illum ut. Quasi eum distinctio neque sunt. Qui cum similique voluptas assumenda.

Ut natus necessitatibus officiis quo saepe. Facilis autem occaecati incidunt ratione blanditiis rerum. Dolore at nam fugit nemo porro nemo eius. Ipsa autem architecto corporis molestias ipsam ullam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”