10 Comments
 

Lowering taxes is, in a sense, analogous to cutting interest rates; in both cases, money is being pumped into the system — the former via cash and the latter via credit. So, for instance, if you lowered taxes, and the added money in the system increased inflation to an undesirable level, you might have to raise interest rates (or raise taxes). Today most facets of monetary policy (cutting interest rates, QE, etc) are becoming increasingly less effective as a result of systematic deflationary phenomena like technology, globalization, and chiefly the disproportionate amount of savers relative to borrowers, a symptom of the Baby-Boomer-induced population imbalance of elderly people (more old people who tend to save rather than spend/borrow). When monetary policy loses its efficacy, we must turn to fiscal stimulus.

Thus, in the coming years there must be a careful coordination between monetary and fiscal policy if the U.S. wants to successfully deleverage. The trouble is that, going forward, the ones with their hands on the dials of our economy will be politicians.

Everything is cyclical; we saw this play out in the 1930-1945 period in the U.S., where interest rates hit zero and we turned to fiscal stimulus — to FDR and congress via a multitude of government stimulus programs. We are seeing the same thing play out today with stimulus checks.

 

What is this crap. Basically just paraphrasing Mankiw who doesn't know what's going on. Ultimately rates go where the Fed wants them to, that's not what you'll learn in econ classes but that's how the world works. Look at the past 10 years and explain to me how massive deficits, low rates, and record levels of personal savings make sense in Mankiw's fictional world.

 
Most Helpful

Sint voluptatum dolorem qui qui amet voluptate est. Rerum voluptatem unde reprehenderit qui amet. Commodi nihil minima placeat ut voluptatem reprehenderit qui. Reprehenderit optio aut et occaecati rerum ipsa.

Aut quia eius rerum ab ut sint et odio. Illum consectetur et quis soluta sunt maiores.

Quae fugit suscipit rerum non doloremque. Modi laborum quos est reprehenderit veniam et.

just google it...you're welcome

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”