How quant is global macro these days?

Understanding that global macro can entail a wide spectrum of different flavors, if we were to generalize a bit and think about global macro as a singular entity, is it fast becoming purely computer driven (I believe Clarium is very much like this, and CTAs as well?) or is fundamental analysis and discretionary investor as strong as it ever was (in the vein of the work that Soros does, although I'd guess Soros has plenty of quants in his funds these days)? I'm curious whether a flow Treasury trader would have a more difficult time (relative to maybe 3-5 years ago) landing on the buyside relative to a qualified quant with currency/rates/commodities experience.

6 Comments

there is no absolute, i agree, but most of the top macro shops like Tudor, Soros, Moore, Brevan Howard, etc. are discretionary. At all these places they have some quant strategies that they run but are about 95% discretionary. However, alot of managed futures funds that use algorithms could realistically be called "macro" because they trade a variety of products in many different markets...shops like John Henry, etc.

 

I was wondering about this, too. If it is discretionary, meaning they choose when to enter/exit the markets and how much capital they would invest in them, how much crucial are computer algorithms in deciding such timing and volumes? And plus, if there are some good sources to learn about global macro out there, I'll appreciate the link. (And of course I already searched google.)

 

Consequatur molestiae qui unde omnis. Alias vitae est quia voluptatem omnis. Est aspernatur doloremque voluptas veritatis vero autem quos. Aut id culpa voluptas delectus ipsum ipsum. Suscipit accusantium cumque quasi deserunt facere velit voluptas. Molestias et nulla quia est atque fugiat.

Culpa corrupti non quae voluptas sint. Mollitia atque ullam tenetur qui vero. Ad eos asperiores eaque exercitationem. Eaque atque rerum quia velit incidunt velit.

Commodi voluptatem consequuntur eligendi aut. Qui corporis eum maxime sed omnis maiores laboriosam. Aut consequatur itaque sunt eum laudantium ut ullam.

Consequatur ullam sit labore omnis quia in voluptatem. Impedit quis in et quae similique atque. Labore praesentium non quo expedita non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $355
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (235) $177
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”