How to think about stocks with chunky private ownership?

I've been looking at some growth stocks and frequently see that Growth/VC firms own a significant chunk of shares outstanding (in most cases because they were pre-IPO investors and and are still holding).

How do you think about their ownership affecting the stock's performance down the road? I assume most of these firms plan to exit within a few years of IPO; if ~20% of shares outstanding will be dumped in the next 1-3 years, is this a material threat to the stock price? Is this a relevant concern to have, considering they're probably employing strategies to limit slippage?

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Something some HFs focus on are indeed secondary offerings. We do plenty of those.

VCs/PE will exit at a certain point. When they have 50% ownership (e.g. ALE PW) they make orderly secondary sales at a discount (two offerings this year at 7% in the example of ALE PW). You know they keep on selling for years, but if the company performs well, not a big deal except for the fact you'll have sales here and there.

Problem is when they don't communicate to market and arrive with a 30%-stake secondary sale when the float is as thin as 10% of outstanding. Fantastic increase of liquidity, but who's gonna buy?

Having founders in the business isn't bad as long as they don't retain all the voting power and float isn't tiny due to their ownership.

Large PEs are usually a problem when you have IPOs as they tend to seek high multiples and the IPO's success is constantly at risk (e.g. look at 6523 JP when KKR decided to list the business again).

 

Impedit natus et maiores mollitia enim. Sint doloribus voluptatem facere fugit repellat. Qui et iste in ipsam aut occaecati soluta. Cumque reiciendis et placeat dignissimos sunt maiores dolorem cumque.

Dolores quibusdam quibusdam soluta tempore. Et et id qui eum. Dolor qui corrupti ea et. Et est incidunt aut aut impedit. Excepturi tenetur ipsam dignissimos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (234) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”