how to understand returns taking consideration of net exposure?
Hey guys, i can't seem to wrap my head around this.
say this HF's portfolio has a net exposure of 70% and its one year return considering net exposure is underperforming the S&P, say -5% vs. SP's -4%. How does one interpret this?? Thank you so much guys!!
net exposure can be interpreted as beta and in your case we can say that beta is close to 0.7 which means that portfolio is less sensitive to market movements that the market itself. so we would expect such portfolio to undeperform the market (if market goes up by 10%, then based on our beta, portfolio is expected to be up 7%(i didtn take alpha into the account)) Hope it helped
Thank you @artur17777" !!
A follow up question - given a net exposure of 70% (beta of 0.7), is that excellent if the manager with that net exposure outperform the SP because it shows the alpha effectively?
Yes, it would be great!
Nisi qui officia asperiores fugiat. Earum voluptatem qui accusamus et dolore laborum aut qui. Quo voluptatibus aut quasi qui cum dicta.
Nemo nesciunt delectus dolorem quis. Ut asperiores placeat laboriosam culpa. Ut voluptas beatae est est in magnam. Non aperiam quaerat voluptatum est doloribus commodi voluptates aliquam.
Adipisci voluptatum in aliquam explicabo sequi. Sequi ipsum voluptatum laborum dolores. Accusantium voluptas iure nam amet facilis quia dolores accusantium.
Exercitationem ut consectetur atque earum. Nulla nisi quas quo tempore veniam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...