In practice, what's the difference between LO HF and AM?
Sorry if the question is retarded......................................................................
Sorry if the question is retarded......................................................................
Career Resources
From my understanding, the major differences are 1. The HF business structure consists of an offshore "holding" company, and an onshore management company that charges fees to the company offshore. They do this for tax purposes, and the investors are considered limited partners. 2. The fee structure, hedge fund management fees are usually higher than traditional AM fees and HFs charge a performance fee which is usually 15-20% of profits not including a high water-mark or hurdle rate. 3. HF's are not subject to the stricter regulations that traditional AM firms are subject to so they can make use of riskier instruments like derivatives.
If I got something wrong I apologize and feel free to correct me.
The lines are blurry, but a LO hedge fund typically:
a) charges a performance fee (usually 10-15% of total profit or 20% above S&P 500, or a fixed benchmark)
b) has a far more concentrated portfolio than a typical long-only fund
Thanks guys, SB'd you all
Modi dolor nemo esse molestiae sunt. Dicta saepe odio omnis aspernatur magni facilis. Dolor cumque mollitia velit aspernatur iste. Voluptatem qui aliquid inventore sunt et et. Rerum excepturi aut nobis aut. Accusantium vitae occaecati alias voluptatem sunt. Sit repudiandae facilis explicabo dolore id molestiae sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...