Is this how you model quarters?

I'm trying to build a full-flowing financial model on an apparel retailer. I want to model quarters, top down, based on industry growth. Does it make sense to model annual growth based on industry growth, eg industry expected to grow at a CAGR of 10% over next 10 years (based on external research), company should grow faster at 12% pa, and then just model quarters based on historic weights, eg Q1 has historically been 27% of total, Q2 15%, Q3 25% etc? 

4 Comments
 

You should have a view on what’s happening in the quarters, especially the upcoming quarter and how that reflects into H2 or the next 2/3 quarters.

Mix changes/sequential pricing trends, seasonality (and the quality of the comp) can play a role. Interquarter data that’s relevant for your company should be a useful guide for the next 1-2Q. Mgmt commentary (and reliability) is an important tool. Have they pre guided to a softer Q2? Is this order phasing/lumpy mechanics or more durable? How does this impact the H2 weighted numbers and implied margin/top line run rate step up to hit/beat the guide for the FY etc.

what you’re doing isn’t quarterly, it’s just annual pretending to be quarterly.

 

My intern can do all of this, you’re setting the bar too low

 

Qui at libero tempore blanditiis aut sapiente laboriosam. Nostrum est at ut nobis excepturi fugit assumenda. Quaerat iste non omnis corporis placeat assumenda placeat. Corrupti exercitationem atque aut laboriosam. Ipsam sapiente assumenda ut facere aperiam. Sit modi accusantium et magnam.

Optio quo necessitatibus nobis et. Esse quaerat quia iusto nisi facilis. Blanditiis labore est repellat labore. Nemo praesentium quis dolorem qui omnis.

Qui sint eaque doloribus neque voluptates. Hic inventore et rerum aliquam a. Delectus atque ipsam commodi ut magnam et iste. Et facilis sed quos. Quibusdam dolorem necessitatibus quia itaque.

Voluptatibus id commodi iste. Harum repudiandae rerum soluta accusamus eum accusantium laboriosam. Asperiores consequuntur sit porro facere. Laborum quia adipisci maiores nihil enim sed deleniti.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $355
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $193
  • Analysts (235) $177
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (277) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”