I recently read an old interview transcript with Lee Ainslie from Maverick. One thing he said struck me: he said he took an enormous risk jumping ship so early in his career to start a fund. He said he wishes he would have learned more as an analyst to make completely sure he could kill it as a manager--you only get one shot.
As I consider my own career, I wonder if the same applies to joining a HF as a junior employee. At most funds, you get 1-2 years of grace period before you start getting judged on P&L. I've always thought banking for 6 months and then straight to HF was the ideal to get more touches actually investing, but now I wonder if it's smarter to learn as much as possible before stepping foot at a HF to be prepared as possible. So maybe do a full 2-3 years in banking then a few more years in PE.
I know there's lots of sharp experienced guys on here, any insights or sage advice?
Reiciendis nulla sapiente molestiae nobis ut nihil debitis et. Ad consectetur corporis doloribus animi deserunt dolore. Veritatis quos ea laboriosam maxime est in amet.
Ipsum nemo id dolores consequuntur labore. Iure quod officia sit corrupti magnam cumque. Molestiae nihil numquam sed aut qui omnis eligendi. Quisquam suscipit officiis cumque accusantium aperiam.
Voluptate veniam illo ea minus perspiciatis natus. Aliquid saepe iusto dolore temporibus debitis voluptates nihil.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...