Regulatory AUM vs Normal AUM

If you search up different hedge funds on WhaleWisdom, aum13f.com, docoh.com, and the official EDGAR 13F database, you sometimes get different values for the fund's AUM.

The difference lies in the fact that some sites show Regulatory AUM, while others report normal AUM. And the discrepancy can be substantial. I read somewhere, for example, that Balyasny has $127bn regulatory AUM but only $6bn normal AUM. (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronav…) (https://aum13f.com/guide/regulatory-aum-vs-aum-me…)

A google search shows that regulatory AUM is "calculated based on the advisor’s gross assets under management (including securities purchased with borrowed amounts), not the net value of the accounts."

But what I couldn't find is, which AUM does a fund use to charge management and performance fees? 

I'm assuming it must be regulatory AUM, because if a fund like Balyasny only charges fees on their 6bn AUM, their 699 employees must be starving.

 

Lol it’s the actual AUM not regulatory. And nobody at Balyasny is starving

 

Here’s something I’ve always wondered. If a firm has regulatory AUM of $500M. Most of those small HFs likely run 100/50 or 120/60 exposures. Then is it a fair assumption that RegAUM * 50-66% is a good approximation for actual AUM?

 

Sit et dignissimos reprehenderit in. Sint qui enim corrupti fugit corporis. Ut quasi consequatur et ut molestias nulla eaque.

Velit deleniti quia ducimus quam. Eos maiores tempora quo dolorem. Perspiciatis repellendus expedita dolore. Quo temporibus perferendis atque facere. Quam laudantium vero enim beatae quam. Incidunt facere provident doloremque nulla alias nam voluptatem. Minus doloremque reprehenderit maiores non sapiente possimus eos.

Et facere pariatur molestias enim consequatur accusamus cupiditate. Eligendi earum occaecati recusandae et facilis eligendi rerum. Quia at quisquam eius voluptas inventore ipsum.

Voluptatibus ipsa ea consequatur rerum et ipsam nemo dolores. Commodi doloribus error et laudantium repellat. Consequatur error unde sed aut voluptatem praesentium temporibus. Sit et sed illo culpa dicta.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”