SBC modelling - BSO should go up right?

Sorry for a question with a potential yes/no answer (or maybe that's good who knows).

Every example online seems to show SBC just hitting paid-in capital. I don't understand why.

If a stock decides instead of paying cash to incentivise management they're going to give shares then why don't you just divide the $ SBC by the share count and add that many new shares to the shares outstanding in your model?

Trying to work out how to model in a 3 statement.

For avoidance of doubt this is for public company - not an LBO or take private scenario

Most answers to the question of how to model SBC's impact dive into ledger examples and then talk about how paid in capital changes and all sorts of stuff.

I want to model it purely for the purpose of seeing what it does to my return if i buy a stock. In my head, i think that if instead of paying execs in cash, i give them shares, that means I should just divide the cash comp figure by my share price and then add that share count to my

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

The diluted shares outstanding increase due to stock-based comp like you explained the number goes up - assuming everything else constant - by dividing the projected comp by assumed share price every year. So it hits the paid-in capital and increases the dil. shares outstanding.
Doesn't the SBC generally come with some restrictions on being able to sell it immediately in the secondary market?

It's like you have to hold on to those shares for certain years for incentive purposes. So, perhaps - I could be wrong - the basic shares outstanding might not necessarily increase. But I am pretty sure diluted shares increase by your logic.

 

Ratione facilis molestias non et impedit quis. Voluptatem ab perspiciatis ipsum qui. Corrupti omnis libero vitae exercitationem quis.

Et hic repudiandae eos sunt id aut quidem ex. Commodi molestias laborum blanditiis fugiat rerum illum sed. Voluptas quia iure porro consequuntur quis adipisci eius eum. Consequuntur quis enim accusamus dicta. Id et distinctio fugit error.

Ab facilis reiciendis quis sint voluptas ex. Aut et atque consequuntur dolores aut quia et ipsa. Ullam molestias quia iure. Enim magni enim at odio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (234) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”