SBC modelling - BSO should go up right?

Sorry for a question with a potential yes/no answer (or maybe that's good who knows).

Every example online seems to show SBC just hitting paid-in capital. I don't understand why.

If a stock decides instead of paying cash to incentivise management they're going to give shares then why don't you just divide the $ SBC by the share count and add that many new shares to the shares outstanding in your model?

Trying to work out how to model in a 3 statement.

For avoidance of doubt this is for public company - not an LBO or take private scenario

Most answers to the question of how to model SBC's impact dive into ledger examples and then talk about how paid in capital changes and all sorts of stuff.

I want to model it purely for the purpose of seeing what it does to my return if i buy a stock. In my head, i think that if instead of paying execs in cash, i give them shares, that means I should just divide the cash comp figure by my share price and then add that share count to my

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

The diluted shares outstanding increase due to stock-based comp like you explained the number goes up - assuming everything else constant - by dividing the projected comp by assumed share price every year. So it hits the paid-in capital and increases the dil. shares outstanding.
Doesn't the SBC generally come with some restrictions on being able to sell it immediately in the secondary market?

It's like you have to hold on to those shares for certain years for incentive purposes. So, perhaps - I could be wrong - the basic shares outstanding might not necessarily increase. But I am pretty sure diluted shares increase by your logic.

 

Ea quas aut ipsum sit nobis id. Animi ab illum est assumenda atque labore accusamus possimus. Ipsa impedit vitae quasi beatae. Id exercitationem vel dolor.

Sit ut et distinctio ut. Temporibus velit cumque dolores dolores. Saepe eveniet ipsum illum at consectetur ea voluptas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”