33 Comments
 

Do you enjoy the sector you're covering? Non-sexy industries can be really fun since it exercises a different set of analytical skills. Sure everyone's got a view on the AI bubble, but how many people have a view on the geopolitics of rare earth metals?

 

Not sure what you mean by that. Are you hoping to just go long semis? 

It will be hard to do that in a true HF

The best sectors / names to cover in my mind tend to have the following characteristics

  1. liquidity
  2. A large ecosystem where there are mispricings across subsegments
  3. Names where you have a right to win
  4. Good but niche sellside coverage
  5. Volatility
 

Thought it was self assumed that a good sector / subsector will have liquidity, volatility, dispersion between high and low quality companies, multiple topical themes. My sense was TMT/Consumer would have a lot of that. Maybe not if you’re just covering staples for example but later  leisure, retail and it’s interesting, I say semis because it’s very thematic now with winners and losers and a shit ton of right way volatility that seems to be happening. 

 

You might also be underestimating what I mean by liquidity.. lot of names in the s&p trade sub 100m a day, even sub 50m a day. If you really want scale, you can’t be messing around with 20m positions. 

 

I think my right to win point is important too though.. i don’t know that much about semis tbh but in staples/consumer I’ve tended to observe a lot of hedge fund knife fights as everyone has the exact same cc data.. so everyone goes short Walmart into print because the “data is bad”. Those type of names are pretty bad coverage in my view because if the data was predictive it’s unlikely the stock moves much and if the data was just wrong you’ll lose a lot of money.

 
Most Helpful

Unironically Crypto is the best IMO

  • massive & increasing liquidity (mostly driven by unsophisticated retail investors)
  • lots of regulatory grey areas where you can structure trades/deals obscenely in your favor
  • high pace means more at-bats
  • large & rapidly growing ecosystem for both retail & institutional investors
  • niche coverage in most areas so investors can have a truly differentiated edge
  • obscene volatility for monetization opportunities 

This isn't to say most or even many of these businesses are "good" investments in and of themselves, but the opportunity to generate incremental and/or consistent profits is very real. Tether, for an example of one of the best companies in the space, is looking to raise at $500b (on the scale of OpenAI) as it's massively profitable and has a better revenue/employee ratio than any other business in the world north of a $100b market cap. And that's despite not even being able to operate freely in the US, the largest market on earth. 

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

PM in HF - Other

The problem with crypto is the concentration of liquidity. Bitcoin & Ether are 75% of the total crypto market cap, most of the $ on the table is in a few bets. If you want a diversified portfolio of bets (i.e. any ratio) you are going to sacrifice liquidity. 

It's certainly difficult but is undoubtedly improving by the day. There are lots of exchanges/DEXs already where its becoming increasingly easier for institutional-size to move between tokens instead of having to reset to fiat without sacrificing liquidity (largely thanks to the massive interest in stablecoins). As institutional access continues to ramp and crypto is more widely adopted by retail around the world that should in theory become less of a problem over time. 

Just to emphasize again, I'm not saying crypto companies are good investments, just that I think this is the best "sector" in terms of opportunity to generate profit. Frankly I think 90%+ of businesses operating in the space are absolute dogs.  

Today you can't be a $5b+ HF effectively deploying wholly into crypto expecting public markets-like liquidity comfortably, which is why so many of the bigger funds have large VC components that more or less operate on the "greater fool" theory for achieving any real monetization. But I do think that day is coming and quicker than most would expect. You're right that 90%+ of strategies today are basically locked into just focusing on BTC or ETH and their derivatives if they want to have real scale, but that in and of itself isn't exactly a bad constraint to have. I know multiple 9-digit funds (almost exclusively quant given the programmatic nature of crypto) that are posting consistent double digit returns with sharpe and sortino ratios above 4x over multi-year timeframes. That kind of performance will continue to draw attention from allocators and by extension the broader cap markets ecosystem, which in combination with governments becoming increasingly friendly to crypto (in part because it lets them pump their own bags for things like sovereign debt/political corruption - I'm not at all arguing this moral hazard is a positive, just that it is a meaningful factor) helps spur the infrastructure buildout necessary to loosen those liquidity constraints.

As far as diversification goes, in my opinion it's less important in practice to be diversified across different tokens than it is to have a diversity of strategies being deployed on the same chain. All tokens regardless of how much liquidity there is have high betas tied to those main 2. It's not terribly difficult to (for illustrative purposes) have a 30/60/10 structure to your portfolio where 30% can rip when BTC/ETH is on a bull run (and can be titrated down as markets turn), majority is just steady eddying it, and have the other 10% structured as an aggressive hedge for the inevitable sudden down swings. The markets as they operate today seem much more applicable to what macro/vol traders are good at, with a smattering of credit (just going off the backgrounds of people I know) than it is for those coming from equities. Because quite frankly, none of these tokens have any intrinsic value/cashflow which makes traditional valuation methods completely pointless. It's much more about exploiting the psychology and behavior of retail than any sort of fundamental analysis.

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Laborum culpa iusto quaerat voluptates quo eligendi quae porro. Cupiditate veniam expedita expedita officiis. Quis maxime sed natus deleniti occaecati excepturi iure.

Laboriosam accusamus aliquid enim consequatur. Voluptas aut eius illo non alias repellendus qui in. Assumenda aliquam ratione non ea impedit. Mollitia odit aliquam rerum cupiditate. Voluptatem natus necessitatibus et unde et aut fugiat aut.

Velit assumenda ut reiciendis libero ut non. Nihil tempore voluptatem nobis odit aut. Aut voluptate asperiores veritatis soluta.

Sit atque voluptas omnis sint molestias esse. Eius ut ipsa dignissimos enim maiores praesentium. Perspiciatis ut eveniet ut soluta doloribus accusamus reiciendis. Minima voluptatem nam magni tempora quidem. Deleniti molestiae ut rem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”