Thoughts on internet L/S

I cover payments and have the opportunity to add internet. Would love to get a thread going on what people like/don't about internet (maybe beyond the w/w data driven moves). Could be totally wrong view, but feel like vast majority of these names outside of the big guys have declining terminal value/not the best businesses? 

what types of theses do you find yourself writing up for core longs/shorts (those you'll own for ntm)? thanks!

26 Comments
 

that is really all that matters. the second a "quality" business like amazon misses earnings, investors will come out with reasons why its a bad business. the second a "mediocre" business like yelp or ebay beats earnings, investors will find reasons to buy them and justify why they are great. focus less on quality because in internet nothing is permanent and it is just a data/number game.  

 
Most Helpful

Is there any way I can come work for you? Or at least where I can find other shops with this mindset? My experience speaking with funds is that there's such a myopic focus on "value" and "quality" (whatever that means) rather than underlying market structure, positioning and the chart itself.

I completely understand the idea of having a long-time horizon to let the business cycle play out and thus for the cream of the crop "quality" names to rise. But that seems like such an inefficient and frankly wasteful way to view markets for an HF. How can one spend years digging for treasure in the form of niche "small-cap value" names when there's momentum ripping everywhere else?

I suppose the idea is again that such quality names will prevail when the inevitable bear cycle begins and the previous momentum leaders are zeroed but still don't see how someone comes out ahead with such a mindset.

 

There’s a lot of verticals within internet — it depends on how you slice it. Internet is primarily juxtaposed vs legacy, with hyper competition intra-vertical (Uber vs. Lyft). Verticals include e-commerce, adtech, digital media (streaming, social/ad network, and gaming), mobility/delivery, etc. and they all have their unique tailwinds/headwinds that’s embedded in todays bets. I recommend utilizing a coverage approach and initiating on the idio (intra vertical performance differentials) first, and then identifying the catalyst you think will drive an inflection. For names “on track” or consistently surprising, you can surf momo through a spread, but would avoid what the other longshortequity guy says about buying momo only. If you’re at a place with decent risk then you should be aware of the short term reversal factor… (take a look at how quick semis dumped in July).

 

Internet is super fascinating IMO but that's just a personal interest, broadly speaking and echoing the above, it covers a broad range and there's many sub-verticals that you can include/focus on. Valuations wise you're looking at MAU, MUV, CCR, ARPU, etc. and really dividing deep into the operating model. Annoying thing is that there's no one-size fits-all approach and also depending on the vertical, they might rely heavily on consumer trends or the macro-economic environment, etc. If it's a big legacy name then much easier to form an opinion since they've been operating long enough on the market and provide enough data to formulate a consensus. For newer names with unique business models, its more difficult to accurately project and you need a strong thesis to support your position, which often hinges on a trend or something speculative rather than data-driven results.

 

elaborate please

in that sectors like industrials or materials have less frequent altdata then it becomes trading monthly/quarterly altdata miss/beats instead of daily Yipit. Not entirely true but this is where most of alpha is generated, not in 12 month theses because while you can develop a 12 month thesis, the state of the industry changes is just too dynamic that within 2 months your thesis is already adjusted for a new unit/ASP vector or margin mix. Not like industrials / mats where the same bet is on supply/demand, marginal cost curves, incremental/decremental and incentive pricing.

 

Ipsum voluptatum eligendi veritatis aut assumenda. Deleniti vitae occaecati voluptas dolorem modi sit qui dolor. Voluptatibus omnis exercitationem perferendis amet unde. Eum placeat et accusamus eos consequuntur sequi. Minus perferendis beatae qui mollitia animi amet repellendus. Hic porro excepturi tempora distinctio amet.

Consequatur fuga vitae a voluptatum magnam et. Sit necessitatibus sequi et rerum id pariatur. Ad ipsam repellendus laborum voluptatibus velit voluptas.

Iure repellendus dolor enim non tempora quas aut. Earum maxime nam fuga velit. Ut non praesentium qui atque et. Pariatur iure nam id reprehenderit. Eligendi repudiandae aut nihil aperiam dolor corporis.

 

Consectetur dolor rerum et maxime nesciunt laboriosam quod. Aut ab ab et alias. Corporis consequatur repellendus aspernatur praesentium quaerat aperiam. Fugit repudiandae maxime earum quibusdam.

Qui id aliquid molestiae amet minima possimus blanditiis. Quas voluptas laborum maxime quo nisi aliquam et. Et dolor natus officiis voluptatem.

Nesciunt quisquam qui molestias in quaerat autem fugit. Nisi laborum veniam sunt sit voluptatem autem dolorem. Doloribus voluptatem culpa quae est eius sit aliquam.

Dicta corrupti voluptatibus optio et. Ut odio reiciendis corrupti nam nobis enim. Ut qui iste hic molestiae quia consequatur officiis amet. Impedit modi reprehenderit sit neque atque perspiciatis. Tempora quod animi dignissimos laboriosam fugiat aliquid.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (233) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”