8 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, Tiger Global operates with a structure that separates its focus on private and public investments. Here's what is known:

  1. Private vs. Public Investments:

    • Tiger Global has distinct strategies for private and public investments. The private side focuses on growth investments, often targeting high-growth companies, particularly in the tech sector. This aligns with the return profile they have sold to their LPs, which is higher than traditional buyout strategies.
    • On the public side, they manage a public equities portfolio, which has faced significant challenges in recent years, as evidenced by substantial losses in their public books.
  2. Investment Teams:

    • While specific details about the separation of teams are not explicitly outlined, it is implied that Tiger Global has dedicated teams or personnel for private and public investments. This is common in firms managing both asset classes to ensure specialized expertise.
  3. Private Side Focus:

    • The private investment strategy is heavily growth-oriented. Tiger Global's private investments often involve a "Frankenstein-y" capital structure, which includes a mix of preferred-like units offering a coupon and debt instruments rather than a pure equity basis. This unique structure allows them to cater to a diverse set of LPs and manage risk differently compared to traditional private equity funds.

If you're looking for more granular details, it might be worth exploring Tiger Global's public filings or reaching out to industry professionals familiar with their operations.

Sources: SoftBank Vision Fund / GIC / Temasek, HFs are less snobbish than PEs, Credit Hedge Fund opportunities, Why do Top PE analysts / associates go to Tiger Cubs?, Private Equity vs Megafund Credit

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Bit outdated info, but they have 3 fund groups:

L/S - Flagship fund

LO - Tech beta 

Privates - Mostly VC

Investment team is split between private and publics and I imagine most of their public team is focused on the L/S book. Usually have analysts doing the grunt work and “partners” which are like sub PMs from what I gather. Private side has had a lot of changes with Lee leaving and then Scott stepping back after all the drama, so now both strategies roll up to Chase.

Not sure what other info you’re looking for but all the people I knew no longer work there. Most started their own funds after being there for 6+ yrs.

 

Determined

Bit outdated info, but they have 3 fund groups:

L/S - Flagship fund

LO - Tech beta 

Privates - Mostly VC

Investment team is split between private and publics and I imagine most of their public team is focused on the L/S book. Usually have analysts doing the grunt work and “partners” which are like sub PMs from what I gather. Private side has had a lot of changes with Lee leaving and then Scott stepping back after all the drama, so now both strategies roll up to Chase.

Not sure what other info you’re looking for but all the people I knew no longer work there. Most started their own funds after being there for 6+ yrs.

Many of their analysts have been there for a while but haven't made "partner" so I have always been curious about that. Is there any managerial / position ownership / comp structure distinction between a fresh analyst taken out of BX and someone who has been around for 5+ years? 

Array
 

Quia quae enim cum ea sequi eum. Est vel magni commodi perspiciatis accusantium autem. Necessitatibus qui et et quae quas voluptas. Accusantium et dolor quo possimus. Voluptatem adipisci recusandae officia qui pariatur. Vitae ducimus dolore voluptate porro aliquam aut laudantium. Et sapiente ea deserunt voluptatem.

Quam sit beatae amet itaque doloremque natus omnis quo. Perferendis quis eaque quod officia et et explicabo qui. Sit quisquam repellat debitis tempore eos fuga. Libero enim temporibus enim quam quam quo non aut. Pariatur dicta at quia quia cumque dolores aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $355
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (235) $177
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”