Timeline to Ramp in L/S vs Long Only?

A couple of the sr. associates / vp's who used to be on the buy-side (specifically L/S) would say it would take them about ~1 week to ramp up on a name (including model and thesis). Does that same timeline apply to a Long-Only? I had a final interview at a middle market mutual fund where they gave me a stock to pitch them that also was 1 week in length, but still haven't been sure if that was just for the interview process or if that's legit how long it should take to ramp on a name that is not in your sector of expertise. Anyone able to outline their usual ramp up process on a name / sector? 

9 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, the timeline to ramp up on a name can vary between L/S and Long-Only (LO) funds, but there are some general insights:

  1. L/S Funds:

    • For L/S funds, the ramp-up process can be relatively quick, often around 1 week for a name, as senior associates or VPs have mentioned. This includes building a model, forming a thesis, and conducting initial due diligence.
    • The process is often more intense and time-sensitive, especially if the stock is moving quickly or if there’s a catalyst on the horizon. Some professionals have noted that while 1 week is typical, it can sometimes take 3-4 weeks if the research process is more thorough or if the idea requires deeper analysis.
  2. Long-Only Funds:

    • For LO funds, the timeline can be similar, especially during interviews where candidates are given 1 week to pitch a stock. However, in practice, the process might be less rushed compared to L/S funds.
    • LO funds often have a longer-term investment horizon, which allows for more deliberate and comprehensive research. The ramp-up process might extend beyond a week, particularly for names outside of one’s sector expertise, as LO funds prioritize deep understanding and alignment with their long-term strategy.
  3. Ramp-Up Process:

    • The typical steps for ramping up on a name include:
      • Reviewing sell-side reports for industry and company overviews.
      • Requesting and adapting broker models as templates.
      • Reading the latest 10-K, 10-Q, and earnings transcripts to understand key drivers and recent developments.
      • Conducting expert calls or leveraging networks like GLG for additional insights.
      • Building or updating a financial model to reflect your thesis.
      • Synthesizing all information into a clear and concise investment pitch.

In summary, while the 1-week timeline is common for both L/S and LO funds during interviews or for initial ramp-ups, the actual process in practice can vary depending on the fund’s strategy, urgency, and depth of analysis required.

Sources: Long term, concentrated, deep fundamental investing, How long does it take to formulate a investment idea / stock pitch, Hedge Fund: The Investment Life Cycle, Looking for seed money but no idea on the how/what/who, Hedge Fund: The Investment Life Cycle

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

It depends on the fund strategy and turnover. Generally low turnover, high conviction places spend more time on a name. 

I've been at a LO where they only spend a few days to one week on a name, another fund spend 1 month when initiating on a name, another fund I've been spent 2 weeks on a name...

Also heard from friends he only need to work on 3-5 names a year, which means spent 2-3 months on a name... 

I think it really depends. Curious about others' LO and L/S ramp pace too. 

 
Most Helpful

I appreciate the insight, I was being to think a 1-week ramp actually isn't that rushed of a time. I know a couple L/S analysts who say it takes them 1-week to ramp up on a name. Do you mind sharing what your steps look like when ramping up? Are there steps you take (i.e. read 2 initiations, 2 10-K's, 3 earning notes...)? I think what has changed my mind from thinking 1-week isn't enough time is I've started developing a process/steps to take when first looking at names and just got more efficient with the reading I do. 

 

Different game being played, right? If L/S then could be almost entirely focused on the next 12 months with an eye on the terminal value or vice versa at a LO. Shorter duration like that almost necessitates a broad coverage since there’s a million things that can move estimates up or down while longer duration ideas are more thematic/directional in nature so you have to do the big picture work which takes time.

 

Very different in different models.

As a generalist in low turnover / thematic / LT focused LS - I spent 2 hours on lots of ideas, 2 days on maybe 1/3 of those and then 2 months on things that ended up going into the book (esp on L side, S side turned over faster so necessitated being a bit more agile).


In L/S pod model I had 2 months to initiate (ie have model and initial thesis / view) on 40 names with help of an associate. Imo not enough time but that seems to be the expectation now. 

Not worked in LO but having explored it / had the convos was told something like 6m to ramp on a coverage universe (maybe 20-30 names).

 

Totam ratione itaque enim iusto. Quidem nobis et voluptatem rerum.

Fuga enim illo occaecati non molestiae quis sit. Cumque inventore reiciendis magnam cupiditate. Possimus exercitationem alias nisi molestias. Ut eos nihil error ut. Totam aliquid nemo voluptatem et.

At delectus non magni eligendi voluptas laborum suscipit. Perspiciatis dolores aut quia qui. Cum officia commodi est debitis mollitia repellat. Qui ab nostrum voluptas.

Accusamus sed iusto est fugiat voluptatibus perspiciatis. Inventore accusamus est est quia beatae. Eos et placeat aut nostrum. Aspernatur ducimus illo illo aut eos aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”