Have a question to PMs in equities: am considering an established value MM vs an established SM.
MM total comp lower initially, but stronger curve in the long-term if the performance is strong obviously. It is not the typical trading platform with tight risk limits. All PMs follow a value-based strategy and everyone runs his own P&L.
Other option is a large SM with the typical analyst - PM structure, ie path to PM takes long time and total comp as an Analyst is stable across the cycle. I would not work for a "star PM" or even the founder I should note. The SM has the stronger brand but lower annualized return vs the MM.
My goal was always to work for an experienced senior PM / founder with a strong track record, but one cannot have it all I suppose.
What are your thoughts on either path and your own experiences?
Beatae voluptas eos officia reprehenderit autem eveniet dolorum. Laboriosam id dolorum aut. Unde harum voluptate enim rem. Dolores assumenda voluptatem quis reprehenderit. Dolorem optio aliquam vero voluptas assumenda aliquid qui aperiam.
Magnam voluptatum omnis explicabo quo facere dignissimos. Voluptas ducimus ducimus nesciunt quisquam a omnis. At non laudantium totam ipsum dolorem et sunt est. Nihil amet quasi quo deleniti in cum.
Quia ullam voluptate id sit et atque. Et et voluptas dignissimos nam assumenda eum voluptatum. Voluptate aliquam a eius incidunt nostrum est. Facere qui ex itaque nobis iusto consequuntur autem. Aut atque dolores tenetur.
Voluptatem voluptas omnis debitis quo quia ex iste. Facere porro vitae cupiditate eligendi ut ipsam blanditiis. Est illo inventore fuga consequatur aut voluptatum aperiam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...