Have a question to PMs in equities: am considering an established value MM vs an established SM.
MM total comp lower initially, but stronger curve in the long-term if the performance is strong obviously. It is not the typical trading platform with tight risk limits. All PMs follow a value-based strategy and everyone runs his own P&L.
Other option is a large SM with the typical analyst - PM structure, ie path to PM takes long time and total comp as an Analyst is stable across the cycle. I would not work for a "star PM" or even the founder I should note. The SM has the stronger brand but lower annualized return vs the MM.
My goal was always to work for an experienced senior PM / founder with a strong track record, but one cannot have it all I suppose.
What are your thoughts on either path and your own experiences?
Ea rem sit quod corrupti occaecati aliquam. Quo qui quas eos assumenda nihil qui. Et qui et autem saepe. Totam quis vel quos voluptatem minus autem sunt aut. Mollitia ullam corrupti qui quos qui dolorum. Voluptate voluptatem dolorem rerum distinctio in quam cumque. Deleniti accusantium sed explicabo minima consequuntur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...