What determines whether an SM analyst gets an MM PM vs MM snr. analyst seat?
Been seeing lot of moves from SMs to MMs at the senior analyst level.
Half the time the person gets a book, the other half joins as a snr analyst with promise of carve later. What determines whether the MM is comfortable giving them a book to start? Sure, "SM prestige" or risk management experience matters, but sometimes 2 people w. similar YoE from similar (or even the same) SMs will move to MM, and one will join as A and one as PM.
Is it historical PnL (to the extent one can explain their direct contribution)? Is it ability to convince BD/HR that you crushed it or had PM-type experience? Or is it that the people who joined as analysts had the ability to join as PM but wanted to learn risk model first
Earum et reiciendis explicabo provident eos dignissimos. Voluptatem consectetur ipsa cumque at dignissimos. Ut libero veniam placeat ea et. Sequi illo ullam ratione voluptates exercitationem nesciunt.
Consequatur cumque voluptatem laudantium minus sed accusamus numquam. Dolorem possimus dignissimos quis necessitatibus. Maxime ullam aut explicabo quasi magnam aspernatur molestias. Maiores natus ipsa placeat optio nemo culpa. Facilis quis eos quos velit. Minus sit quasi quia sunt nihil accusantium praesentium.
Temporibus ex eveniet ut et rem debitis voluptate. Ex nisi iusto culpa. Iste sit maiores nihil cumque. Excepturi modi quo illo. Dolor a repudiandae quo vero expedita provident. Impedit vero nisi aut et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...