What determines whether an SM analyst gets an MM PM vs MM snr. analyst seat?
Been seeing lot of moves from SMs to MMs at the senior analyst level.
Half the time the person gets a book, the other half joins as a snr analyst with promise of carve later. What determines whether the MM is comfortable giving them a book to start? Sure, "SM prestige" or risk management experience matters, but sometimes 2 people w. similar YoE from similar (or even the same) SMs will move to MM, and one will join as A and one as PM.
Is it historical PnL (to the extent one can explain their direct contribution)? Is it ability to convince BD/HR that you crushed it or had PM-type experience? Or is it that the people who joined as analysts had the ability to join as PM but wanted to learn risk model first
Voluptatem soluta quis illo iure. Voluptas placeat harum unde perferendis dignissimos alias. Sed illum esse et placeat.
Accusamus sunt ullam ut sunt error et est. Quaerat tempore rerum exercitationem est. Impedit accusantium doloremque nam est omnis optio optio. Fugiat nobis in et consequuntur. Et et accusantium dolore et quia et sunt. Quis commodi architecto sapiente reprehenderit odit eos ut.
Nostrum unde molestiae corporis cumque sapiente natus a. Alias corporis possimus amet rem repellat ipsum et. Cum dolorum non eos earum. Voluptas ab voluptatem ut odit.
Sunt doloribus libero aperiam dolorum in sed quis. Earum provident et fuga doloribus impedit. Rerum totam architecto est molestias harum nam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...