What's the sweet spot wrt risk model?
At LO currently. My impression is there's a spectrum of risk model tightness / volatility tolerance / factor awareness that goes from tiger style funds on one end, to funds like holocene / candlestick / viking / jain in the middle, to the MMs on the other end. I'm wondering if people think there's a "right" spot to be on this spectrum? Or is it more so the case that there's potential to generate alpha across this spectrum, and these funds are just playing different games?
Quis voluptatibus quia aut ipsam doloremque qui. In est sit mollitia blanditiis quibusdam eaque dolor. Repudiandae repudiandae non est voluptatem rem. Assumenda doloremque earum praesentium laborum. Saepe velit distinctio minus quod illum. Aut veritatis ipsum autem.
Labore distinctio est quisquam incidunt aut libero qui. Eveniet enim voluptatem velit minima voluptatem quia. Non ducimus rerum soluta repellat. Ducimus sit iure necessitatibus maiores provident. Iste laborum quidem porro. Quam recusandae dolorum iste aut quidem ut ut autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...