400Q Guide Error?

My issue is with the awnser to the following question:

Would an LBO or DCF give a higher valuation? 

Technically it could go either way, but in most cases the LBO will give you a lower valuation. 

Here’s the easiest way to think about it: with an LBO, you do not get any value from the cash flows of a company in between Year 1 and the final year – you’re only valuing it based on its terminal value. 

With a DCF, by contrast, you’re taking into account both the company’s cash flows in between and its terminal value, so values tend to be higher. 

My take: In an LBO the cashflows between purchase and exit clearly deliver value, they reduce the debt end thereby increase the value of the equity the sponsor owns, so this can't be the reason for the valuation difference. I had heard a different explaination: For a DCF you use WACC as a discounting measure, the closest figure from an LBO for that is the IRR, although its more like

Different use, but same concept and the IRR is usually 20%+, which the cost of equity would barely never hit and then that decreases the PV of the company ceteris paribus the sponsor is able to pay less

2 Comments
 

The point is that, mechanically, in a DCF model, you include the value from cash flows along the way into the overall value of the company. In an LBO model, only the terminal value is compared to the entry price. This leads to a lower valuation most of the time. I don't think the question is getting at the actual value driven by incremental cash flows, but instead simply the mechanics of the model. Hope this is helpful.

 
Most Helpful

Consequatur cum amet excepturi eum non at. A tempora alias occaecati dolore voluptatibus. Debitis provident odio assumenda qui illum quis animi. Ut sint deleniti laborum veniam.

Qui quia consequatur soluta est autem. Possimus hic atque harum esse modi maxime deserunt. Animi voluptatem qui nemo voluptatum. Atque facere soluta voluptas odio. Aut asperiores qui et pariatur culpa provident rerum. Illum qui voluptatem deleniti velit pariatur totam eaque.

Aliquam est commodi illum placeat doloremque sit. Et deserunt voluptatum velit labore. Corrupti consequatur mollitia a qui eius voluptas ipsa. Sit nihil tempore in illum deserunt eveniet. Tempore dolorem dolorem aspernatur cumque non doloribus. Vitae laboriosam ut qui id molestiae non quia. Rem ipsum id qui laborum quisquam.

incentives triumph ethics

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”