400Q Guide Error?

My issue is with the awnser to the following question:

Would an LBO or DCF give a higher valuation

Technically it could go either way, but in most cases the LBO will give you a lower valuation. 

Here’s the easiest way to think about it: with an LBO, you do not get any value from the cash flows of a company in between Year 1 and the final year – you’re only valuing it based on its terminal value

With a DCF, by contrast, you’re taking into account both the company’s cash flows in between and its terminal value, so values tend to be higher. 

My take: In an LBO the cashflows between purchase and exit clearly deliver value, they reduce the debt end thereby increase the value of the equity the sponsor owns, so this can't be the reason for the valuation difference. I had heard a different explaination: For a DCF you use WACC as a discounting measure, the closest figure from an LBO for that is the IRR, although its more like

Different use, but same concept and the IRR is usually 20%+, which the cost of equity would barely never hit and then that decreases the PV of the company ceteris paribus the sponsor is able to pay less

2 Comments
 

The point is that, mechanically, in a DCF model, you include the value from cash flows along the way into the overall value of the company. In an LBO model, only the terminal value is compared to the entry price. This leads to a lower valuation most of the time. I don't think the question is getting at the actual value driven by incremental cash flows, but instead simply the mechanics of the model. Hope this is helpful.

 
Most Helpful

Deserunt error numquam hic ea qui quisquam. Aspernatur doloribus aut et delectus nam et qui sint. Officia tempora blanditiis commodi omnis libero quod quas. Fugit corporis id omnis deserunt molestiae dolorum perferendis. Rerum suscipit sit quaerat.

Dolorem voluptatum et maiores ut. Modi nam sit iure eaque consequatur aspernatur omnis. Quo ut cupiditate repellendus distinctio. Non nihil eum vel ex et eum aut. Cumque suscipit voluptatem maiores cupiditate. Officiis quas cum nobis accusantium et. Veniam laboriosam tempora suscipit minus sint adipisci.

incentives trumph ethics

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”