Accretion / Dilution - Question

1) Assumptions: P/E target 10x; P/E acquiror 20x; 10% interest on debt -100% Stock = Accretive -100% debt = Accretive -x%Stock & x% Debt = ?

2) Assuming two financing structures: 1) 60% debt, 40% stock; 2) 60% stock, 40% debt

Is there a quick and dirty way to determine which acquisition financing structure will be more Accretive?

I understand the more debt (cash) used to finance a transaction, generally the more Accretive the transaction will be, but I would like to know if there is any way to calculate (quickly using mental math) the difference in accretion.

Thanks in advance.

6 Comments
 
Best Response

You gave two of the exact same considerations, but I think you meant one was 60% debt, 40% equity and the other was 60% equity, 40% debt?

We already know the cost of debt after-tax is basically 10%*(1-T) in the deal. The cost of equity after-tax is inverse buyer's P/E (since you are using your own shares to fund the deal) so it would be 10% flat. Debt is cheaper and so the first set of considerations I listed should be more accretive.

To determine the numerical difference between the two consideration structures you would have to assign share price values and a number of shares. So let's say Buyer Co has 10 shares worth 10 dollars each with $1 of EPS each ($10 earnings total, 10x P/E, $100 dollars of shares total) and Seller Co has 10 shares worth 20 dollars each with $1 of EPS each (10 earnings total, 20x P/E, $200 dollars of shares total). Debt has a 10% flat rate pretax. Let's also assume a 40% tax rate.

In Situation A (60% debt, 40% equity) you pay for 120 dollars of the company with debt, at an effective rate of 6%. The other 80 is paid for by issuing 8 new shares. You now have 20 dollars of earnings but you have to pay $7.2 on the debt and you have 18 shares. Your EPS is around $0.71 per share.

In Situation B (40% debt, 60% equity) you pay for 80 dollars of the company with debt, at an effective rate of 6%. The other 120 is paid for by issuing 12 new shares. You now have 20 dollars of earnings but you have to pay $4.8 on the debt and you have 22 shares. Your EPS is around $0.69 per share.

I also don't know why you are making the assumption that the deal is Accretive in an equity swap. This is impossible given the P/E numbers you listed, as the buyer shares are worth basically half of the seller's shares. (100% stock situation is always dilutive given a buyer P/E which is lower than seller's P/E). Also, looking at the rough math that I did I have no idea how this deal could be Accretive in an all-debt situation either since the interest rate is so high.

 

Spot on with the last statement that the transaction will generally be dilutive with the buyer's P/E being lower than the seller's in an all-stock deal. However, I just want to correct your math a bit. In both scenarios, you say 300 dollars of earnings, but you are thinking of market cap in that case. Adding stand-alone earnings would put consolidated earnings at 20 before considering synergies and the effects of interest and tax expense.

 

Debitis sed qui suscipit a magni animi. Sint illum ab velit aperiam dolor rerum. Sunt cumque qui quia voluptas quia et repellendus.

Fugit cupiditate est iste est molestias voluptas beatae. Sit illo quos et aut. Quis aut nihil qui optio atque dolores numquam. Voluptatibus voluptas nihil labore debitis sunt nesciunt. Praesentium quibusdam omnis ea iure. Error qui et quis et esse et.

Cumque occaecati aperiam rerum reprehenderit rerum temporibus quidem. Voluptas perferendis et voluptatum exercitationem magni. Aut omnis quis nesciunt autem sed rerum. Placeat dignissimos blanditiis voluptate in tempore et. Eaque officiis error fugit et earum aut.

Exercitationem qui sit fugit dignissimos aut sequi. Libero voluptatem aut voluptatum rerum necessitatibus. Sequi recusandae repellendus deserunt doloremque in eveniet. Est aut numquam illum totam sed qui. Atque voluptatem quos sint natus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (56) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”